User talk:Summstjr

Hello, I'm Soham. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Hello, Summstjr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of tallest buildings in Milwaukee‎, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 32.218.32.63 (talk) 15:53, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...a problem I am having with an article I have edited as another user continues to delete some of the things I have done without any real explanation, at nothing that makes any sense to me. I would like advice on how to deal with this issue, or if possible, for another editor to take a look at the article to see if he/she sees any problems with it. If I am doing something inappropriate I would be glad to correct it for future. The article in question is "List of Tallest Buildings in Milwaukee." Thank you.

Summstjr (talk) 15:59, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As the edit summaries state, your edits violate MOS:IMAGE (gigantic images violate guidelines) and MOS:CAPTION (captions should be simple and straightforward, not run on for half a dozen lines of text). 32.218.32.63 (talk) 16:42, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Summstjr:, the fist thing I would suggest is taking a deep breath. No editor owns an article or even their edits. Reverting is a normal part of the editing cycle. Since you are having difficulty with the images you are trying to add to that article, I also suggest that you read the Help Pages on Images. That might provide you with an answer on how to properly format the images you are adding so they don't overwhelm the page. Remember, people are reading this page on tablets and cell phones, too, and really big images disrupt their view of it. If you have further difficulty with your edits, the normal place to discuss them is on the talk page of the article in question. In this case, that would be Talk:List of tallest buildings in Milwaukee. Hope this helps. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:17, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...looking at the current photo in the upper right hand corner of the "List of Tallest Buildings in Milwaukee", and tell me how this is an improvement over the most recent one I had posted. I have seen thousands of photos on Wiki larger then my most recent photo the editor reduced. You can barely make out the buildings now without clicking on the photo. Now, I must add that I was definitely in error with my initial photo submissions on this page, and I also was in error with too much text in the photo captions, but I believe I corrected both errors, yet when the photo is now shrunk to the minuscule size that it is, I confess, I simply do not understand these parameters, especially when I see far larger photos on similar pages (List of Tallest Buildings in...).

I apologize for taking up your time over what I am sure seems like a trivial matter.

Thank you.

Summstjr (talk) 19:36, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This should be discussed on the article's talk page. That's a better place to get feedback from editors on what image, in what form and size, should be used in the lead. In particular, there you can ask the editor who reverted your changes why they did so. Huon (talk) 20:01, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Northwestern Mutual Residential Tower, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Northwestern Mutual Residential Tower and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Northwestern Mutual Residential Tower during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ReeceTheHawk (talk) 10:56, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Northwestern Mutual Residential Tower. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 19:30, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kiteinthewind was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Northwestern Mutual Residential Tower and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kiteinthewind ^{Leave a message!} 00:25, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Summstjr, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kiteinthewind Leave a message! 00:25, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Summstjr. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Milwaukee, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 32.218.32.141 (talk) 20:46, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Northwestern Mutual Residential Tower, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Summstjr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Northwestern Mutual Residential Tower".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 10:02, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Summstjr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]