Search results
There is a page named "User talk:Stumink" on Wikipedia
- puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stumink. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate...2 KB (85 words) - 21:40, 5 June 2018
- Sock-puppet of Horhey420. What do think? Regards, Stumink (talk) 13:42, 16 September 2013 (UTC) Hi Stumink, I've been through that editor's contributions...3 KB (344 words) - 21:07, 31 May 2014
- abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Stumink per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stumink. It has been blocked indefinitely...6 KB (389 words) - 14:14, 18 February 2023
- abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Stumink per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stumink. It has been blocked indefinitely...7 KB (746 words) - 14:14, 18 February 2023
- Surely this is a mistake? Stumink (talk) 14:09, 30 October 2013 (UTC) Corrected. Someguy1221 (talk) 17:46, 30 October 2013 (UTC)...1 KB (22 words) - 17:46, 30 October 2013
- abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Stumink per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stumink. It has been blocked indefinitely...3 KB (507 words) - 14:14, 18 February 2023
- abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Stumink per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stumink. It has been blocked indefinitely...10 KB (972 words) - 11:09, 19 February 2023
- decade https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Stumink/Archive https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:GreenCows https://en.wikipedia...13 KB (1,966 words) - 06:22, 28 January 2024
- program is virtually identical to what Horhey and his sock-puppets added. Stumink (talk) 18:31, 23 June 2015 (UTC) Yes, that's pretty clearly them. I've...10 KB (1,667 words) - 21:18, 13 May 2022
- me adding the word collaborators. It is more accurate than dissidents. Stumink (talk) 13:14, 3 November 2012 (UTC) I compromised. I figured the term "disloyal"...6 KB (538 words) - 09:51, 14 November 2012
- and are comfortable doing so, could you please look into: WP:AN3#User:Stumink reported by User:Nick-D (Result: ). It appears to the same issue you followed...102 KB (13,438 words) - 00:41, 6 April 2023
- state of the United States" in the type of government section. Regards.Stumink (talk) 23:13, 12 October 2013 (UTC) I have also requested admin intervention...69 KB (9,440 words) - 02:50, 4 March 2023
- ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 23:06, 5 May 2014 (UTC) I have informed Stumink of the SPI. Stumink has made some valuable contributions to Wikipedia, and not all...69 KB (9,650 words) - 02:49, 4 March 2023
- to the US (x2). Stumink claims that he/ she forgets to log in, but, if you look at the edits on the 4th of May, he/she edited as Stumink at 21:16, then...382 KB (30,811 words) - 22:08, 6 July 2024
- times you were blocked and had this exact same reaction (accusing Nick-D, Stumink, CJK, and I of forming a cabal to censor your "forbidden knowledge" on...15 KB (2,269 words) - 11:46, 13 June 2021
- that do make an attempt to estimate the total death toll from executions? Stumink (talk) 22:40, 5 August 2016 (UTC) There were countless Western reporters...70 KB (10,126 words) - 04:04, 7 November 2016
- reworking and you seem to no what your talking about so what do you think? Stumink (talk) 21:17, 18 September 2013 (UTC) I have complained about the sources...54 KB (6,171 words) - 20:38, 12 February 2023
- is more beneficial if it exists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stumink (talk • contribs) 10:15, 23 May 2012 (UTC) There was a very clear consensus...126 KB (10,060 words) - 00:41, 6 April 2023
- Inayity. Perhaps you can help. This refers to the contibutions by user Stumink, no stranger to you. 1. I could have dropped the editor a note, but I see...112 KB (14,824 words) - 18:56, 5 March 2023
- may have noticed already, but this user has been blocked as a sock of Stumink, an unfortunately prolific sockmaster. Vanamonde (Talk) 03:43, 22 April...438 KB (29,621 words) - 15:59, 6 August 2024