User talk:Spudlace/Archive/2021/March

Hello,

About this: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sciences_Po&diff=1010723909&oldid=1010720777

If you look at the talk page, most users are in favor of reducing the section and I am against. I reduced it to please other users. So my changes are new are were not at all reverted by other users. One other user just added back the template because it was too long, but I precisely shortened it.

Please note that my revisions fall under pending changes even though I am autoconfirmed.

Thank you.

--Delfield (talk) 08:29, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Delfield: Because these changes have since been reverted several more times by different editors I can now only advise you to start a discussion on the article talk page. Spudlace (talk) 21:57, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Spudlace, I admired your uw message here. Can you tell me what you do to proudce the "this edit" link in it? I can't figure out the options for it. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:14, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Sanskrit on a "Language and linguistics" request for comment, and at Talk:Jehovah's Witnesses beliefs on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment, and at Talk:2021 West Bengal Legislative Assembly election on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment, and at Talk:South ParQ Vaccination Special on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:51, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:31, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Lorene Scafaria on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:35, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

I recently added Category:Pontic Greek cuisine to multiple food-related articles (e.g., pita, lavash, nettle soup). You reverted most of these edits because they weren't sourced. However, I provided sources for these foods under Pontic Greeks#Cuisine.

Should I add these same sources to each individual food page?

Thank you!

Kravk (talk) 15:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes they should be added directly to the articles. Spudlace (talk) 21:15, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]