User talk:Spiritoftheeast1993

Hi Spiritoftheeast1993! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for making a report at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you. IanDBeacon (talk) 21:22, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

User:Spiritoftheeast1993, I noticed that you removed the tracklisting of the soundtrack album "Bolt" without providing an appropriate reason for removal. The link you gave with accordance to just educates about soundtrack album and not anything else. Could you clarify? and rather be more specific in providing a brief summary after making edits. Thank you! HimuTheEditor (talk) 13:53, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@HimuTheEditor: In WP:MOSFILM#Soundtrack it says "Track listings for film scores are generally discouraged" and "Noteworthy tracks from the film score can be identified and discussed in prose". So only historically or culturally significant soundtracks warrant a full track listing. Otherwise it's best to just discuss the most significant songs/instrumentals in the article. Spiritoftheeast1993 (talk) 20:43, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

 – Replaced copied text in Fiscal conservatism

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Conservatism in the United States into Fiscal conservatism. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 16:34, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's becoming increasingly clear that you ignore warnings, and you may even think that if you remove them from your talk page that they no longer apply. They will always be in the history of this talk page. That's the first place an admin will look when they come to block you. Removing a warning is clear evidence that you saw the warning. If there's something you don't understand about minor edits, ask right here, right now. Otherwise after your next inappropriate edit, we'll be discussing your editing at WP:ANI. And you certainly can't claim that you haven't been warned. Additionally, refusing to communicate with other editors is not an option on Wikipedia. Sundayclose (talk) 05:53, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sundayclose: You're confusing me. I read the guideline page which says that minor edits change only a few bytes, which I assumed is 100 bytes or less. What do you want me to do, stop marking edits as minor altogether?

On another note, you've really had it out for me ever since that maintenance tag incident a few months ago. Notice that after that fiasco I never removed maintenance tags again, so you can see that I have been making an effort to change.

Also, STOP REVERTING MY EDITS. Most are legitimate edits aside from wrongly being marked as minor. Spiritoftheeast1993 (talk) 06:27, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You either didn't carefully read WP:MINOR, or you completely misunderstood it. It's not determined by number of bytes. As clearly stated in the guideline and multiple warnings you have received, a minor edit occurs when "only superficial differences exist between the current and previous versions. Examples include typographical corrections, corrections of minor formatting errors, and reversion of obvious vandalism." Nothing about counting bytes. Adding a new category is not a minor edit. Reformatting and adding items to a table is not a minor edit. If it's wrongly marked as minor after three warnings (and now this, the fourth warning), it is not a legitimate edit. This has nothing to do with my being "out for" you. It has solely to do with your disrespect for other editors, failure to follow policies, and refusal to communicate. That clearly is not "making an effort to change." The choice is yours; you can heed multiple warnings, or you can continue the same pattern of disruptive editing and explain your edits at WP:ANI. No, I will not stop reverting your disruptive edits. Since you don't seem capable or willing to understand what a minor edit is, I suggest never marking an edit as minor. You'll never go wrong if you follow that practice. Sundayclose (talk) 04:51, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings @Spiritoftheeast1993

Hi, I am User:Bookku, On Wikipedia I engage in, finding information and knowledge gap areas in Wikipedia and promoting expansion of related drafts and articles. Came across your recent contributions to article Gender role.

I am looking for some draft article initiation support for Draft:Sexual politics if that topic would interest you.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 05:06, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure I can help

Spiritoftheeast1993 (talk) 12:26, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Spiritoftheeast1993 Lot many thanks for your valuable contribution and support.

Best wishes and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 14:27, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Color terminology for race. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

There was an RFD for Yellow people before and the term currently redirects to Color terminology. Please discuss at the talk page there if it should be split out.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yellow (racial classification) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:03, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Maxim (magazine)

added links pointing to Grace Park, Magdalena, Kate Walsh, Rachel Nichols, Foxy Brown, Peyton List, Allison Williams, Catherine Bell, April Rose, Taylor Hill, Hilary Knight, Natalie Morales, Julia Fox, Rebecca Garcia and Jessica Hart

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spiritoftheeast1993. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yellow (racial classification), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spiritoftheeast1993. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yellow".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:08, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spiritoftheeast1993. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sexual politics, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spiritoftheeast1993. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Sexual politics".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:49, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]