User talk:Soramire

File:IMG-20190227-WA0022.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! —usernamekiran(talk) 08:30, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly be mindful about the three revert editing rule. You have been reverted, and advised by many editors (through their edit summaries), regarding the chicken's photo. You have also communicated through edit summaries, signalling you are aware about comments by other editors through their edit summaries. Kindly do not re-add the edits. The current photo (which I added back), is a lot better, and follows WP:MOS guideline. If you continue with adding the photo again, or "breed is being maintained by [some institute]", then you might get blocked. —usernamekiran(talk) 12:27, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Kadaknath shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —usernamekiran(talk) 13:45, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Regarding the explaination you provided in this edit summary: wikipedia is not for promotion. Also, wikipedia has clear guidelines about what kind of photos should be used in the article. A human being holding a chicken, on the article of chicken, where the chicken cant be seen properly is not a good photo for the article. The other photo, where chicken can be seen perfectly, is the ideal photo. —usernamekiran(talk) 13:50, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I registered a complain about you, and your editing at administrator's noticeboard. If you dont communicate there, you have extremely high chances of getting blocked, and you will lose your editing privileges. The discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Soramire slow edit war, promo on Kadaknath chicken. —usernamekiran(talk) 17:35, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Kinu ^t/_c 23:59, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Soramire. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. TomStar81 (Talk) 08:01, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Kinu ^t/_c 08:04, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Soramire (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

So you blocked me on provocation by others. I am fine but just to put things in perspective. I am one of the lead scientist from icar and part of team which leads promotion of this breed to international markets. India is the only country where this breed has so much medical values. You can read my papers published in last 7 years. Also, to the point where you replied stating that I am not an SME, please understand we studied this breed in my phd and now working in this team for last 12.5 years. So I guess I have more information that anyone else on this subject. Anyways, you guys are helping scamster by showing a wrong image. You all need to understand, farmers dont understand all whatever is written, they go with the picture and the picture on article is a mixed breed/fake bird. The scamster show this picture to farmers and then tell it is on Wikipedia, so it cannot be fake and that establishes the point and farmer who is not educated fell for this. If you guys feel you can live peacefully with this stopping me by supressing info, then let me tell you farmers have committed sueside because of these people.

Decline reason:

None of this is relevant. Please read WP:GAB and please reread WP:EW. Yamla (talk) 12:23, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Hi. If you really want photo of original breed on the article, then upload a good photo of chicken. The photo you tried to insert doesnt even show the chicken properly, half of the chicken is covered by the guy's hand. Also, kindly read MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE. It is a guideline about how photos should be. —usernamekiran(talk) 23:05, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]