User talk:SleepysInc
Welcome
Hello, SleepysInc, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. If you are looking for help, please do any of the following:
- visit the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have
- type
{{helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will answer your questions shortly - visit the directory of help pages
There are a lot of standards and policies here, but as long as you are editing in good faith, you are encouraged to be bold in updating pages. Here are a few links you might find useful:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~), which produces your name and the current date. Also, it would be a huge help if you could explain each of your edits with an edit summary. Again, welcome! --Evb-wiki (talk) 13:59, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
November 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Sleepy's has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 14:57, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- Hey Sleepyco, when you create a wikipedia article about something you are involved with or have a strong affinity for, this is what happens. Stuff can get added that you don't like. Whether that "stuff" should be there can be discussed on the article talk page, but you will find it difficult to get it removed by blanking it without explanation. Cheers.--Milowent (talk) 22:17, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- Sleepys, please read my comment above. Your account may be blocked if you continue disruptive editing like this. You just blanked stuff you don't like again.--Milowent (talk) 15:58, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
- Hey Milowent, the copy around The Hartford Courant issue under the "Criticism and controversy" section is inaccurate and one-sided. The referenced articles are barely reliable and do not back-up any "accusations" on behalf of the attorney general. The attorney general simply investigated a consumer complaint. This story is about an HR problem at a newspaper. Sleepy's sells many thousands of mattresses every month. There are going to be complaints. This complaint was investigated like any other, but involved a messy HR issue between a columnist and editor at The Hartford Courant. Please rewrite or remove the copy surrounding this issue from the "Criticism and controversy" section. --SleepysInc (talk) 19:13, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- I will give it another look. I'm not shocked that it may be blown out of proportion.--Milowent (talk) 19:15, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- What do you think about removing the COIN message on Sleepy's page? It has been completely re-worked six ways since Sunday by external sources. SleepysInc (talk) 00:58, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Sleepy's. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sleepy's. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC)