User talk:Sitethief/Archives/2013/March

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

This same 31.x ip has been calling me a 15 year old, and said "trolling by one kid in few years", and keeps calling me "Asian"

This is racist, and these are not ture at all. I have been living in Thailand for 7 months, and in fact I'm 21.

I can post the picture of my Polish ID card, but, I won't do because it is being personal.--110.49.232.179 (talk) 15:48, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Can you link me to these edits? Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 15:49, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

You have to see in history of Telewizja Polska article.

Now what will you do?--110.49.233.173 (talk) 16:15, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Drink some coffee! Want some? Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 16:19, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

I mean TVP article.--110.49.249.39 (talk) 16:37, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, my fault for not noticing it was you. Let me take a look at it. Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 16:40, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

I can't get a very clear picture of whats going on, could you perhaps ask this question at Wikipedia:Help desk ?? Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 17:14, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Congrats Sitethief, vandals hate you and some IP vandal has vandalised your user/user talk page. Arctic Kangaroo 15:56, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Hihi, thanks! Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 15:57, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Hey Sitethief, since you use Huggle, I assume you have Rollback rights. However, I see an adoption notice on your user page. So, I'm wondering if you are keen to be my CVUA student to learn more about anti-vandalism on Wikipedia. You will not only learn how to revert vandalism, but also about requesting page protection, speedy deletion and much much more. For more details, see WP:CVUA. If you're interetsed, reply me on my talk page. Cheers, Arctic Kangaroo 16:12, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Hmmm, I like to use Huggle to do something back for Wikipedia sometimes. Haven't really done anything in a while since today. I can't predict my activity levels, as after my adoption I did go pretty inactive. But I'm inclined to accept your invitation. So thats a yes for now! Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 16:18, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

	CVU Academy Notification
	Hello Sitethief/Archives/2013! Your Counter Vandalism Unit Academy page is now ready! Click here to quickly access your Counter Vandalism Unit Academy page. Good luck and enjoy learning about countering vandalism! :) Arctic Kangaroo 16:31, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Also, more info about my activity here. Arctic Kangaroo 16:35, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! Btw, is this box messing with my talk page? I can't seem to fix the following item? Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 17:06, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Arctic Kangaroo 17:07, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

← "Click on me"  ~E:74.60.29.141 (talk) 20:13, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Like in many policy-propaganda rticles you define EU in the article "Great powers" limited.Wiki is used criticizing EU withourt sources.Who says that is limited?The majority of academics think the opposit.

Sorry, I don't get it... Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 22:47, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Please be careful when you call edits "vandalism." Regardless of the merits of their edit, I'm not seeing a willful attempt to deface Wikipedia. If it's not blatant vandalism, your reverts could be construed as edit warring. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:49, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, clear case of argumentum ad verecundiam regarding User:Valenciano's revert of User:O9837tr7xs's edit.I saw a whole lot of editting going on on top of a revert of that same user (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Master%E2%80%93slave_morality&diff=544433377&oldid=544431879). I will keep out of that article for now, I'm only doing Vandalism control, I'm not interested in getting pulled into an Edit War. Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 22:46, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

There was a notable alternative calendar (Ehoah Globus Kalendar) that was not mentioned on the Gregorian Calendar page and the Calendar Reform page so I added it. It is a legitimate calendar that is completely relevant to the topic and shouldn't be disavowed.

65.92.205.173 (talk) 18:51, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I saw it as pure promotional, please try to get a consensus on the talk page of the articles in question about the placement of the link. Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 22:49, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello Sitethief, I will be celebrating my birthday on 19 March. So, I would like to give you a treat. If you decide to "eat" the cookie, please reply by placing {{subst:munch}} on my talk page. I hope this cookie has made your day better. Cheers! Arctic Kangaroo 15:54, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Regarding changes to the page Gorillaz discography, the section in 'Music Videos' and 'Studio Albums' claiming there to be a fourth album are an obvious farce. No prof exists regarding any information or is provided. In addition, the fact that those additions are tacked on with no other edits are indicative of obvious trolling with the intent to drum up unnecessary hype. I stand by my removal of those sections and believe that unless any source can be provided, even of questionable reliability, they should be taken down. Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.87.152.65 (talk) 01:02, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

The things you wrote in this edit don't really fit into an encyclopedia like Wikipedia, therefore I reverted it. In regards to your second edit, simply deleting information because you don't agree with it is not really constructive. Maybe you should first discuss this on the talk page of that article?? Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 01:22, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

I didn't think anyone around here agrees with false information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.87.152.65 (talk) 01:28, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

I never said your information was false. You just have to give a source for your information. Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 01:30, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

With regards to page Clydebank College, this was posted to inform users who stumbled along the page, about the college merging with two other colleges in August 2013. I don't see why this has been removed, maybe because I haven't referenced it? Reference here: http://www.westregionmerger.com/

81.109.229.157 (talk) 01:09, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

I reverted this because the wording wasn't according to Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Using words like 'delighted', 'state-of-the-art', 'brand new' are not really factual or neutral an even come over as promotional. The last sentence "Campus identities will reinforce the importance of local provision and will be named after our local towns: Greenock Campus, Clydebank Campus and Paisley Campus." seems to be copied from somewhere else, as it refers to 'our local towns'. If you rewrite it to adhere to Wikipedia:Neutral point of view it will probably stick. Also consider reading [[1]].Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 01:19, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback and the section of the article has been rewritten. --Mikeydunno 01:55, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Why do you revert an edit based on "unexplained removal of content" when the edit summary includes an explanation? 68.55.123.86 (talk) 20:59, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Okay, lets call it "Not sufficiently explained" then Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 21:04, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

How is "none of these are references to NM that meet WP:GNG. These are all trivial and anecdotal jokes that aren't even plot elements of songs/movies/tv shows. total WP:LISTCRUFT" not "sufficiently explained?" 68.55.123.86 (talk) 21:10, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

That does not warrant removing entire sections. Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 21:12, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Did you look at what was removed? 68.55.123.86 (talk) 21:13, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Yes I did. Also, WP:LISTCRUFT is an essay, not a guideline or rule. Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 21:17, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

So is WP:BOLD. One you should check out again is WP:AGF. 68.55.123.86 (talk) 21:31, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

"Don't get upset if your bold edits get deleted." Also, it gets kind of hard to AGF when you revert vandalism involving blanking pages, spam, and a random assortment of slurs all evening. So sorry for reverting your edits, I suppose I should have asked you first. I suggest you discuss your changes on the talk page and come to a consensus. (And I see you already brought the issue up there) Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 21:34, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Who in this discussion has made slurs, vandalized or spammed a page? Sounds like you really should revisit WP:AGF or perhaps take a break from your crusade of assuming all IP editors are vandals. 68.55.123.86 (talk) 21:48, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

I wasn't referring to you with that... I hardly assume that all IP editors are vandals, and I never said such a thing either. On the contrary, most edits I see from IP editors are, though most times small, rather constructive. And I already apologized for reverting you. Please tell me what more do you want from me? Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 21:51, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia is full from clearly muslim proselitist articles. Get a life!. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kabalakhbar (talk • contribs) 22:13, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

That is your opinion, and you have a right to your opinion. Thats does not permit you to go against WP:NPOV and WP:MOSISLAM inside articles though. Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 22:16, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Could you edit my deleted text so I can repost it and not violate the NPOV?

Let me see Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 17:54, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

You can take it from here. This is your old revision, so don't save it because it won't show up, just take the text out, edit it and save it. You could consider quoting some parts of the text, for example in the Core Values~, Ministries or Purpose sections in order to adhere to WP:NPOV since they come over as rather biased towards MTW. The article should be of a neutral standpoint, except for quotes, but they should be only used to support other texts in the article rather then stand on its self.Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 18:00, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for being a vandal fighter.--I dream of horses @ 19:11, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, and you're welcome! I'm still learning every time I encounter vandalism though. On a side note, could you maybe help me with setting up archiving for my talk page? I've seen that you have a mighty fine one set up yourself, but I can't figure out how to get my archives to show in a neat box... Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 19:16, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

I use Cluebot III. Here's how to set it up. --I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 19:21, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

I am Thomas Hill and I edited the page stating that the assistant principal is leaving. How do I cite that and why do I have to? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.226.151.34 (talk) 01:27, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi Sitethief, I see that you have been quite active but I see no response on your CVUA page. Do you still want to continue the course? Arctic Kangaroo 13:25, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

I'm still interested, I ment to ask a few questions. I'v been gathering my thoughts (And a few diffs on my Notepad) on the subject of vandalism and I planned to post them this weekend, or even today or tomorrow evening. But it seems like I have a bad case of Inguinal_hernia, I have a doctors appointment this afternoon to see whats what. Depending on that I'll post on my CVUA page some of these days. Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 13:30, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

I see. Never mind, don't need to rush your CVUA. Just remember that there are no deadlines, and you are free to take a century to complete one lesson. I was just wondering. Arctic Kangaroo 13:41, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Yeah I have been using vandalism patrolling as occupational therapy for the pain ;), which works out fine I might add :P . Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 13:44, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

I noticed this but you were faster. This is really an example of vicious vandalism. It looks like the vandal worked under Camoo3000 and Leecho62; in order to make the RClers revert to an other vandalized version. --Avoided (talk) 13:46, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Haha talk about simultaneous posting ;). But no problem :). For a second I almost warned you though :X , good thing that you are white listed :P. Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 13:48, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

I was marked with a Level 2 warning, because I was providing free information in which users can easily see on a FREE mobile application. Since mobile technology is become the new basis for all user types, the traditional website is still widely used, but not as easy as a mobile application.

In order to have an understanding, can you please explain to me what is the difference between a free website that has advertisements, donations, or premium products and a mobile application that offers the same thing?

Seems free websites are acceptable on Wikipedia, why shouldn't mobile applications.

Furthermore, Wikipedia has a mobile application on Google Play and this makes it quite biased to restrict free mobile applications and only use free websites.

If everything is understood, kindly remove the warning ad accept my link as this is to provide users of all types an easy and FREE way to read their desired information.

Regards, S — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottii1985 (talk • contribs) 14:12, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

The thing I posted with Daughtry is true, I even sent a twitter update that Chris posted himself, if you visit his twitter, you can see him and Scott Stevens. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.218.225.194 (talk) 21:29, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Re your message: Not a problem. It's very easy to miss something when there is tag team vandalizing going on. Looks like somebody's homework assignment is on the fur trade. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:00, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Source for the:

But the latest information from variety resources has been revealed that Bank of America is the biggest fund and deposit holder of USA government and listed as the most used bank for money laundering in the United States.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-09/fbi-says-cartel-used-bank-of-america-to-launder-money.html http://www.bizjournals.com/charlotte/blog/bank_notes/2011/11/report-bank-of-america-warned-by.html?page=all — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.113.26.42 (talk) 20:52, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Then please reference that in the article instead of here, see WP:CITE if you don't know how. Anyway this point is moot now since the article has been semi-protected and you can't edit it right now, unless you register an account. Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 20:56, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Comment from a talk-page watcher:

The place to discuss additions that are removed are on the article talk page, at talk:Bank of America.

That said, the sources you list above do not support your statement. One mentions that BoA was utilized in one case of money laundering, but also specifically states "Bank of America isn't accused of any wrongdoing" - at no point does it state your claim that BoA is the most used for money laundering. Also, neither source states anything regarding being the biggest fund and deposit holder of USA government as you claimed. If you do wish to develop a community consensus that the content belongs, you will need to find sources that actually state those claims, and work on the article talk page to get consensus from others if your edits are removed. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:12, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Transferred to Commons commons da, new versiyon, gerekçe: This is a candidate to be copied to Wikimedia Commons.. — Lubunya — 20:59, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

The please put that in the summary for next time. Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 21:01, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Dear sirs,

Thank you for your comments. I just realized I had messages from you. I am a new member and am learning how to edit existing entries.

Regarding Japanese orphans in China, I noticed that the entry of the book in "Further reading" section had no link, which is nowadays extremely useful device, therefore I added a link to its Amazon cite. Was it an inappropriate editing? Please let me know.

Regarding Liao Zhongkai, there was no "Further reading" section, and I did not know where to add the reference book. Now I learned how to add "Further reading" section, and placed the book there. I think I was able to place the book in a rightful place. If it is wrong, please let me know.

Regarding Liao Chengzhi, I placed the new book at the top, because all the other books were older and also most of them are in Chinese, which are not be very useful for English-speaking readers, whereas this new book is the latest book on Liao Chengzhi and also in English. If you think that the order is inappropriate, I understand. Please let me know of your input on this so that I can learn more about editing. Thank you.

Regarding Hidesaburo Ueno, I thought that I entered the new book on his "Further reading" section yesterday, but it seemed to have disappeared this morning. Therefore, I entered it again this morning, without realizing that I had messages from you regarding editing problems (to which I am responding). I did so before I read your messages. This book is very much about Dr. Ueno, practically his biography. I put the new book at the top, because it is the newest book and also the most detailed book about Dr. Ueno. If the order is inappropriate again, please let me know. I will place it at the bottom.

In summery, I am new at editing, as you can see, and I had no intention to violated your guidelines. I would appreciate your input very much so that I can learn more about editing. Thank you very much for your help.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hachikocookie (talk • contribs) 12:11, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Please delete this user. We were trying to setup an article page and did not want to create a new 'user'. This was done by mistake. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.60.2.130 (talk) 15:11, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Thats okay, mistakes happen. User accounts normally don't get deleted, you can just leave it be. If you want to blank the pages please do that through the user account itself, not another user, as I can't see if its the same user/person doing the blanking.. Also, I've seen two refusals to accept the Naked Turtle Rum article in the Articles for Creation process, both listed at your talk page. Please do not try to go around these proceedings by creating the article outside of this process. And since you refer to we , per WP:NOSHARE you are not allowed to share a user account with multiple persons. One account = one person, be advised that this can lead to a block on your IP. Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 15:25, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Just want to say thank you for not responding to my message and failing to understand the concepts of mobile technology compared to current internet technology.

If certain websites were allowed, such as free mobile sites, then this could enhance the experience for wikipedia users.

Regards, S — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottii1985 (talk • contribs) 13:37, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

You are posting links to the free version of an Android app which:

• Add no extra information to the articles,
• Are not used as a reference (Which would not make it okay either)
• Is not a source where you can easily read the content mentioned
• Is only available for a limited audience
• Does not even mention the article in question
• Not to mention that I can't check if the link added even is relevant to the article since the article in question is not mentioned on the page linked, and I can't install android apps (nor can millions of other visitors). For all I care it could just as easily be malware.

Also, Inclusion of one spam link is not a reason to include another Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 14:33, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

this user raghusri is issuing block warnings to me for word disambiguation and spelling issues on wikipedia, the user raghusri has issued block warnings to me 3-4 times and is abusing me, (he has no idea what wikipedia is) i need ur intervention, he is mistaking spelling issues, with vandalizing a page, poor guy Murrallli (talk) 14:09, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Waiting.. Waiting... Waiting... When you come up with a reason why a Free mobile application is no different that a free website, your statement for me spamming products is invalid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottii1985 (talk • contribs) 20:01, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Dear User:Sitethief, thank you for your message. I created the redirects from Medical biology to Biomedicine, because I was sure that these are the same and that these are just Alternative names. In my page (_{talk to me}), you can find more explanation of the reasons. I'm unsure that you have read the explanation by this time. Hence, if you will find my explanation weighty enough, please, restore the redirects. --Andy Quarry (talk) 20:44, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Is this a typo, Vanishes/VaRnishes?

Was the TV episode correct with the 'r'? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.192.128.116 (talk) 21:45, 27 March 2013 (UTC)