User talk:Sharmamohit008

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. Please have a look at WP:RS in connection with references. You have to give outside references to show coverage and notability. The subject's own site can be given as a link, but the outside references are essential. Peridon (talk) 20:08, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is another attempt to get you to understand that the references you have given are not adequate - by Wikipedia's standards. All three are connected to the subject, and by Wikipedia's definitions, this means they are not independent and reliable. If suitable references are not given, the article will be liable to deletion. I am not saying that your sources are not truthful - just that, in accordance with the standards of Wikipedia, outside sources are essential. Peridon (talk) 21:10, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article GIM's Samriddhi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No attempt seems to be being made to supply independent references for this article, despite requests. The notability of the subject is at question, and the article has become what looks like the programme for this conference - possibly falling foul of Wikipedia's rules on advertising.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peridon (talk) 13:43, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]