User talk:Shaginyan

Please be aware that adding papers that you have written is likely to be considered self-publicising and therefore a conflict of interest here on Wikipedia. If something you wrote is of interest on a topic, you can either put it on the talk page for neutral editors to consider, or leave the topic alone - major papers always get noticed eventually. Adding citations yourself without contributing information to the article is strongly deprecated. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:38, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the only paper on the theory of quasicrystals. This paper is sited by the physical community.

JzG who have also removed the references says that he cannot find any citations and now he keeps silence after I send him the link. Now you are trying to find another false argument to remove the reference. I do not use a nickname in contrast to you, therefore my action can be seen, while you build the case on the fact that I do not use a nickname. Please write a letter to the administrator about your suggestions so that we can resolve our issue.

1) Please do not attack or denigrate any other editors, that is wholly unacceptable conduct.

2) Editors are free to choose usernames.

3) Your conflict of interest would have been suspected whatever name you had chosen, but as it is not now in doubt, I was certainly correct to flag it up as an issue.

4) I have now issued a warning, below, for your 3 times repeated attempts to force your citation into Wikipedia. If the paper is important, editors will certainly make use of it eventually; I have made no judgement of its notability, only of your conduct. Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:27, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Quasicrystal. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Please do not try to carry forward your self-publicity by edit-warring. That will get you nowhere. Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:22, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Chiswick Chap, You violate my right to add references. I guess, you are trying to mislead the reader by making an impression that the critical behavior of quasicrystals is not explained. Please restore the references, and do not mislead the reader. My references have nothing to do with self-publicising, and offer the explanation of the critical behavior. If you know the other explanations, please let me now the corresponing references and I will add them.

This is to complaint on the deliberate deletion of our edits made to „Quasicrystal” article in Wikipedia. Chiswick Chap writes us that our edits are promotional. In fact, we add two more references (one article in Physical Review B journal and other to monograph from Springer) in the world renowned publishers, which, in our opinion, make the article „Quasicrystal” more unbiased and objective rather then promotional. This is because the latter references add one more model, which not only permits to describe the physical properties of quasicrystals but gives the only (i.e. absent in the references already cited in the text) explanation of the similar behavior of quasicrystals and heavy-fermion (HF) metals. If authors of the article „Quasicrystal” and/or Chiswick Chap can give other references about latter similarity, let them add those references or give them to us and we will add those references along with two above references, which are all time being deleted by Chiswick Chap. We think that the adding the aforementioned references is in full compliance of the Wikipedia requirement of maintaining a neutral point of view.--Shaginyan (talk) 17:32, 27 December 2016 (UTC) Shaginyan (talk) 17:32, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Drm310 (talk) 04:57, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is to complaint on the deliberate deletion of our edits made to „Quasicrystal” article in Wikipedia. User Chiswick Chap <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Chiswick_Chap> writes us that our edits are promotional. In fact, we add two more references (one article in Physical Review B journal and other to monograph fromSpringer) in the world renowned publishers, which, in our opinion, make the article „Quasicrystal” more unbiased and objective rather then promotional. This is because the latter references add one more model, which not only permits to describe the physical properties of quasicrystals but gives the only (i.e. absent in the references already cited in the text) explanation of the similar behavior of quasicrystals and heavy-fermion (HF) metals. If authors of the article „Quasicrystal” (and/or Chiswick Chap <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Chiswick_Chap>) can give other references about latter similarity, let them add those references or give them to us and we will add those references along with two above references, which are all time being deleted by Chiswick Chap <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Chiswick_Chap>. We think that the adding the aforementioned references is in full compliance of the Wikipedia requirement of maintaining a neutral point of view. We ask you to permit to add the references to the „Quasicrystal articles”. While this deliberate removal of our references misleads the reader making the reader guessing if there is any reference on explanation of the critical behavior of quasicrystals. This deliberate removal we consider as a clear vandalism.

On behalf of the coauthors of the papers, Vasily Shaginyan, Shaginyan (talk) 10:38, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]