Search results

Results 1 – 20 of 24
Advanced search

Search in namespaces:

There is a page named "User talk:SecondSight/Misandry" on Wikipedia

View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
  • a feminist POV. We are both against misandry, so there is no reason for us to fight over the page. --SecondSight 22:36, 22 December 2006 (UTC) Please...
    17 KB (3,005 words) - 01:13, 6 January 2007
  • (UTC) Hi SecondSight, just thought I'd let you know about a complex vandalism report I recently wrote. I just came across your rewrite of Misandry and I...
    71 KB (10,901 words) - 00:59, 28 February 2023
  • the misandry article, but he was part of it. --SecondSight 01:15, 23 April 2007 (UTC) Thanks for taking an interest in the recent debacle at Misandry. The...
    45 KB (6,916 words) - 05:39, 15 March 2023
  • contribute. --Ephilei 01:50, 6 March 2007 (UTC) I noticed you over at misandry and was wondering if you could help out. I have tried to comunicate about...
    45 KB (7,061 words) - 18:28, 4 March 2023
  • he is slapping on it. Perhaps you can see what you think. Thanks. --SecondSight 09:18, 10 September 2006 (UTC) Oops, I spelled the page wrong: it is...
    79 KB (10,893 words) - 06:51, 26 March 2023
  • to be avoided. Since misogyny is mentioned in the first sentence of the misandry article, it seems like it is prevalent enough in the article to not be...
    116 KB (15,377 words) - 21:52, 2 March 2023
  • with the N&Y article. --SecondSight 00:24, 17 April 2007 (UTC) Hi Edgarde you've been doing some great work on the Misandry and Nathanson and Young articles...
    220 KB (31,921 words) - 05:59, 16 June 2024
  • the report. The WikiProject Gender Studies was vandalized. SecondSight's rewrite of misandry was stymied by Trolling. This is not a content dispute this...
    46 KB (6,270 words) - 08:15, 3 April 2023
  • non-judgemental helps.Uetz 06:13, 4 June 2007 (UTC) Thanks for the reference at misandry, if indeed is was you who provided it. Reliable sources are very helpful...
    35 KB (5,521 words) - 20:52, 18 February 2023
  • disruption. Binksternet (talk) 03:58, 23 January 2013 (UTC) I was over on the "Misandry" page for a definition I was looking up. While checking out the article's...
    149 KB (8,178 words) - 15:15, 25 March 2023
  • talk page. I dug up some evidence of their bullying User:SecondSight at their rewrite of misandry in december as well. BTW I've gone ahead and asked Anacapa...
    68 KB (8,913 words) - 13:29, 14 February 2023
  • also dropped a line to Anacapa. I uncovered bullying by them of User:SecondSight and a recent edit war at Shunning. This might not have been the best...
    230 KB (32,273 words) - 13:40, 2 March 2023
  • obvious by observing the male of the species in his habitat." I hope your misandry doesn't affect your editing.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.152...
    286 KB (37,817 words) - 05:57, 23 February 2023
  • lectures on sexism that I tend to disregard any content complaint alleging "misandry." — Francophonie&Androphilie(Je vous invite à me parler) 02:52, 11 December...
    163 KB (22,308 words) - 00:04, 7 October 2022
  • “politically motivated rapes,” and “all men are rapists” and “blatant misandry” and things like that. I told Cybermud that I thought talk pages aren’t...
    252 KB (29,800 words) - 04:41, 3 April 2023
  • receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Misandry. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this...
    103 KB (11,464 words) - 09:28, 10 March 2023
  • scholarship. then it sure as hell is a violation of WP:NPA and can be reverted on-sight, plus whatever templated warning is applicable in the situation. Oh, and...
    97 KB (13,287 words) - 23:43, 17 February 2023
  • editors who take delight in removing items from the Violence against men and Misandry categories, but who pay no heed whatsoever to the Violence against women...
    653 KB (85,502 words) - 19:04, 23 April 2023
  • main namespace. They fall under speedy criterion R2 and are deleted on sight. Thank you, and happy editing, Kusma (討論) 08:53, 15 October 2006 (UTC) Wow...
    115 KB (17,701 words) - 09:06, 3 April 2023
  • conform to the manual of style unless there's a compelling reason not to. Second, it's quite important to add reliable sources whenever you make factual...
    251 KB (21,482 words) - 17:23, 5 June 2022
View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)