Search results

bot (talk) 12:14, 20 April 2013 (UTC) (Done) --Scientiom (talk) 16:58, 21 April 2013 (UTC) Hi Scientiom. In case you are not aware, there is an upcoming...

Little green rosetta/sockwatch/Benjiboi Little green rosetta/sockwatch/Scientiom I'm slightly confused as to how to contact you so I am posting here. What...

blocked Lsufalcon and not Scientiom was that only Lsufalcon had violated 3RR at the time. I blocked Lsufalcon at 15:20 UTC and Scientiom made his fourth revert...

other account that's not blocked as of now. That's your original one, Scientiom (talk · contribs). You can't keep just doing that - Alison ❤ 08:02, 28...

Knowz and Scientiom wanted, but added a couple of details in so it doesn't state the wrong thing. The second accusation was when I took Scientiom's objection...

attempt to make clear the research pointing to biology in the article. --Scientiom (talk) 11:21, 24 June 2013 (UTC) Then don't make the stupid changes again...

an edit-war. If you have content disputes with Scientiom, then you need to work them out unless Scientiom is clearly violating policy, in which case you...

can be presented in the lead, as it most certainly is a notable fact? --Scientiom (talk) 14:54, 17 March 2013 (UTC) “그리고 북한에서도 동성애자에 대해서는“세기말적인 부르주아적 타락”으로...

(UTC) It's all there in the body of the article - please have a look. --Scientiom (talk) 12:30, 25 August 2012 (UTC) In response to your question: More...

orientation. Shouldn't it include biology-related statements specifically? --Scientiom (talk) 13:29, 18 April 2013 (UTC) You've been reading the talk page, I'm...

page. Are you just reverting me for the sake of reverting me, perhaps? --Scientiom (talk) 12:31, 4 September 2012 (UTC) I believe the section in question...

who I can remember by name. If you wish to deal with this. Thank you. --Scientiom (talk) 09:32, 18 March 2013 (UTC) Questions: 1. What actions will be taken...

March 2013 (UTC) What would be the follow-up on this [4]? Thank you. --Scientiom (talk) 09:42, 18 March 2013 (UTC) If you believe that the user is a sockpuppet...

wrong to revert Scientiom. You made the first reversion on September 7, and now you've reverted again. Just as I unblocked Scientiom early, I also unblocked...

they'll change the article while you're on "vacation." This is exactly what Scientiom did to Lsufalcon at HA. Just wait for other interested editors--i.e. me--to...

please ask them to stop doing so? Thank you. --Scientiom (talk) 08:12, 14 October 2012 (UTC) Sure Scientiom, I will have a look at it an see if I can help...

law, Discrimination, Hate speech, Witherspoon Institute. Thank you. --Scientiom (talk) 12:55, 28 March 2013 (UTC) I have some doubts about them. For example...

I'm writing it down to off wiki business. If my examination troubles Scientiom, they can rest easy if they simply don't sock anymore.  little green rosetta(talk)...

17:40, 8 March 2013 (UTC) Do you have an opinion on the discussion with Scientiom on his talk page about merging it into Homophobic propaganda and renaming...

submitter. Also, Arthur Rubin said "..but the two immediate reverts by Scientiom, and the single unjustified revert by the nominator, may also separately...