User talk:Salem121

A page you created, Template:Northern Democratic Party (United States)/meta/shortname, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is a test page. Use the sandbox for testing.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 22:29, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Northern Democratic Party (United States). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - History of the United States Democratic Party. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at History of the United States Democratic Party - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Whenaxis (contribs) ^{DR goes to Wikimania!} 22:58, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from American Jews. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:17, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We're taking that question about the 1920 Election info box to the talk page, where it belongs. No sense getting in a stupid edit war. Feel free to chime in. —Tim //// Carrite (talk) 05:39, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see from your edit history that you're new here... Straight into the maelstrom, eh? If I can answer any questions or help you out in any way, feel free to ask. If you'd rather use email than the Wikipedia talk pages, I can be reached at MutantPop@aol.com. Welcome to Wikipedia, sorry if you're feeling oppressed. It can be like that at first! Carrite (talk) 05:42, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Barack Obama, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 23:15, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Grover Cleveland. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 23:19, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We normally don't include them in the notes of the exit list. If we've included traffic counts, it's been a mention in the text of the article, and always with a citation to a source that gives the statistic. Imzadi 1979 → 12:22, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. TEDickey (talk) 22:35, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at United States presidential election, 2000 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Fat&Happy (talk) 22:51, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited United States House of Representatives elections, 1916, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Mann (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]