User talk:STMICHAEL7

January 2010

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Peralta Stones. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 19:17, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Peralta Stones, you will be blocked from editing. Please stop adding this unreferenced and entirely unencyclopedic material. Drmies (talk) 19:40, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have some clearing up to do: you keep adding that material to User:John V. Kemm--either you are vandalizing someone else's user page, or you are operating two accounts without acknowledging that you're doing that. If you are in fact Kemm, you should follow the advice on Wikipedia:Changing username or, if you ever use both accounts in a manner which editors perceive as deceptive, risk being accused of sock puppetry. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 19:46, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Peralta Stones, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. That's it: final warning. Drmies (talk) 19:49, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Peralta Stones. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Forgot to make it a level 4 warning last time--no matter, let this be your final warning. Drmies (talk) 19:57, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, in your copy and paste job you managed to copy the references I found, so that they were in there twice (though, of course, incorrectly formatted). Those references, just to make things clear, do not support the text you added. Drmies (talk) 19:59, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Repeated Vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. FASTILY ^(TALK) 20:04, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

STMICHAEL7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

page was the same for awhile now and the some one recently started changing or deleting info and i didnt know how to address it or correct it i am truly sorry

Decline reason:

Perhaps you would care to explain why you ignored the repeated warnings to stop, and why you were editing another users' user page? I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:02, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.