User talk:Rydex64

Welcome. I hope you like this place. Wikipedia sure can be a bit barren, but there are still many things to discover. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 09:34, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rydex64. Thank you for your work on ThirumaLi. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to  where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. )

Grabup (talk) 08:16, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article you are requesting speedy is paid disclosed article, and is already reviewed by reviewer check into review log, stop requesting CSD unless you dont have proper knowledge for COIN related articles. 115.96.219.132 (talk) 07:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Masala Coffee, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rydex64. Thank you for your work on Varun Sunil. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work. An image would be nice if possible.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:10, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rydex64, I hope you are good. You recently Draftified this article with the reason stating that it is not ready for the mainspace. I would like to seek guidance from you about the issues in the article and how we can improve it. I am looking forward to discussing it more. Thank you for your time and consideration. Dosedsneer (talk) 13:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When you move an article from article space to draft space, please provide an explanation that is more specific than saying that it is not ready for mainspace. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Dosedsneer, Apologizes for the delay in response. I was away travelling so I couldn't look into my Talk page much. I draftified the page since I couldn't find any Independent sources about the subject in the article. It would be great if you can go ahead and add them re-submit once it's ready. Please refer WP:IS. Thanks.

Thanks for your contributions to Mass Appeal India. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and does not pass WP:SIRS. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:41, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mass Appeal India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Orchard.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:59, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rydex64, would you mind explaining how you got the File:Varun Sunil.jpg image? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 19:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jeraxmoira, The image was actually photographed by myself during Masala Coffee's concert in JCT College. I do concert photography sometimes. 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 04:41, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's great! Did you share the photographs with Varun Sunil as well? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 10:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jeraxmoira, Thanks! Also, I did share my photographs with their event team. May I know why please? 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 10:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you are directly in contact with Varun Sunil, you need to disclose this. I hope you are familiar with WP:COI. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jeraxmoira, I'm totally aware about WP:COI. Currently, all the pages I contribute to on Wikipedia are purely out of personal interest in the subject. If a conflict of interest arises, I will disclose it. Thank you.

Varun's page was also done by myself. He's the guy behind Masala Coffee and I listen to them and him quite a lot! ;) 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 13:21, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rydex64, I noticed that you closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gul Wareen as delete and accordingly tagged the page for G6. However, while the consensus was clear in this case, it is generally not advised that non-admins close discussions for which they cannot enact the result, since an admin would still need to come by to ensure the process is completed properly. (In other words, non-admin closures requiring admin action do not save any admin time and so have the potential to cause more problems than they solve.) I would suggest you stick to cases where the result is an unequivocal keep/merge/redirect/draftify as you gain more experience with the process. Cheers, ^Complex/_Rational 12:13, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ComplexRational, Thanks for the feedback! This is my first time experimenting with XFDCloser Tool. I really value your feedback and I'll ensure to stick with the suggestions you gave me. I have read WP:NAC. Let me know if there's anything else I need to be aware of, please! Cheers. 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 12:32, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly! And feel free to give me a ping if you have other questions. ^Complex/_Rational 13:54, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Walter Breen was in fact convicted of those crimes, so if you want to remove it from the lede and have it stay out, I recommend a better rationale than just "not constructive". DS (talk) 22:36, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @DragonflySixtyseven, Apologizes for the error! I mistakenly thought the content was non-constructive or possibly vandalism. It appeared to be categorizing the crime as an occupation, both in the content and the infobox. I don't have a personal view on the subject and I'm not attempting to safeguard the subject. I reverted it because the crime was already detailed under "Walter Breen Arrests and Convictions" and someone else previously reverted it too. Please feel free to revert it back and correct me! :) Thank you. 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 05:48, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whether it's appropriate right there is a different issue, but it was clearly well-intentioned, and thus not vandalism. Note my own edit summary here.

It's an interesting question: for people who were notable for reasons aside from their horrible offenses (e.g. Russell Williams, whose military career may well have meant he met general notability requirements), in what way should the offenses be incorporated into the lede? There may already be something about this in the manual of style; if not, perhaps I'll start a discussion. DS (talk) 16:20, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Oru Kadha Parayum Neram. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:40, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Vedan_(rapper)

You have moved the above page to draft space from main space. Can you please relook now. More details added Navaneethmadhusoodanan (talk) 08:51, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like there's plenty of info missing about Vedan and discography needs to be updated. No sweat, just improve it in the draft and let me know when you're good. I can then move it over to the main page. Happy editing. 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 09:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you not look at the page history when you draftify? I accepted the article as part of AFC review. Do you have an issue with it? — hako9 (talk) 10:09, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Next time do not draftify articles that AFC reviewers have passed. Better yet, do not draftify as you clearly do not know what you're doing here. If you disagree, you can nominate for deletion. Also, I hope you answer questions regarding your actions here. — hako9 (talk) 15:21, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, @Hako9! I didn't realize the article had already been reviewed. I noticed that the article needs quite a updates and there’s a lot of info missing for it to be ready for the main space, which is why I moved it to the draft section.

The article doesn't have to go through AfD because the subject has good sources. 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 16:03, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Usually, reviewers just need to check whether the WP:AFCPURPOSE test is fulfilled, i.e whether or not the article will survive afd. I passed it in the above case, because obviously I thought it would survive. On a side note, you absolutely have the right to question an afc review. Doesn't matter if the person who passed an article has 1k edits or 100k edits. But instead of re-draftifying (which is basically edit warring with the reviewer) you should go through afd or bring the afc reviewer to an admin's attention (if that reviewer isn't doing their due diligence before passing). — hako9 (talk) 16:17, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know about that, @Hako9! I'll note that. Cheers!

Also, Just curious on your thoughts on Vedan (rapper). Do you think moving it to main space would be a better idea until the article is developed in draft or let it be on main space and let editors update the page eventually in the future? 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 16:54, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I already moved it to mainspace. — hako9 (talk) 17:05, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]