User talk:Russellrado13

September 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Great Dismal Swamp has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Great Dismal Swamp was changed by Russellrado13 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.947916 on 2013-09-07T19:15:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:15, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Séminaire Nicolas Bourbaki. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Séminaire Nicolas Bourbaki was changed by Russellrado13 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965661 on 2013-09-07T19:27:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:27, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|2=reason=Your reason here ~~~~. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid ^(Talk) 20:09, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Russellrado13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Russellrado13 (talk) 19:08, 17 March 2014 (UTC) I was foolish in randomly trying to edit things, I would love to contribute to the community and will stop randomly editing things, i just would like a second chance![reply]

Decline reason:

You were not randomly editing; every one of your edits is a vandalism. You will need to produce a much better reason before we will consider an unblock. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:56, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.