User talk:Rudra555

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 5.101.65.94 (talk) 15:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rudra555. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
• instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you.

EDIT WAR??? I've made ONE change to your page. Contrary to your delusionary allegations, this IP is not associated with any of the other IPs that may be editing your account. 161.113.11.16 (talk) 18:23, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Oh no it's you, always. Same edits, same reverts, trolling on other pages (Autograph, Tony Mills, Marc Boals, and many more), always doing a little meaningless cosmetic editing ( a comma here, a weasel mention of Docker's Guild there, all of which have been deleted by other editors) just to then revert to your petty disruptive tactics. Your language patterns match perfectly and final proof is that once blocked for a month, all your IPs went silent together. You are obviously a sad person that thrives on pettiness and pointless harassment for personal gratification, whatever your pet peeve with Docker is. I don't care. Three admins are well aware of your tactics and behavior. You go off on another provocation and you WILL be banned and this time permanently, no matter how many IPs you change or use. Final warning. Wikipedia is supposed to be FUN, and it's people like you that are ruining the experience. You've been warned (again!) and this one is final. Play with fire at your own risk.Rudra555 (talk) 20:31, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of indefinitely for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Yamla (talk) 16:05, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]