User talk:Rubytuesday274

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Enhypen, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- EN-Jungwon 08:44, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jake Sim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 09:12, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rubytuesday274! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 09:12, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rubytuesday274. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jake Sim, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rubytuesday274. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jake Sim".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:42, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rubytuesday274, you may have noticed that I have reverted a lot of edits that you have made to DOY articles. These are mainly for entries where the link is to a musical group. This does not meet the style required for these articles, where the link must be for a person, and a person who is notable enough to have their own individual article. If they are just mentioned as part of a wider article, for example a group they belong to, this is not sufficient. Please have a look at the style guide to help you make edits that will not be reverted. Thanks a lot, Kiwipete (talk) 07:09, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see my error, I had seen another individual who had been linked to a musical group and presumed it was valid.

Will all edits be reverted (including those who did have their own pages such as Oscar Piastri)? Rubytuesday274 (talk) 08:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rubytuesday274, no worries. It's preferable, though, to read the "Please read before editing" notice which is displayed whenever you edit a DOY article - that has all the guidelines that you need to follow, rather than follow someone else's (possible incorrect) edits.

I saw your addition of Oscar Piastri which was valid. I tried to make sure that I did not revert the valid entries you added, so that one is still there.

Thanks, Kiwipete (talk) 07:15, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]