User talk:Rousearts

Hello Rousearts! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- Chavatshimshon 05:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting Help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution Getting technical Cleaning up vandalism Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

I have placed a proposed deletion tag on Organization Development Institute and Organization Development Institute's as I do not believe that these articles satisfy Wikipedia's sourcing and notability guidelines, and as they are effectively duplicates. If you disagree with the deletion of one or both of these articles, you may remove the proposed deletion tag and the article will not be deleted by the proposed deletion process. However, the article may still be placed on articles for deletion to reach consensus on whether or not the article should be deleted. It is courteous, but not required, to explain why you disagree with deletion if you choose to remove the tags. If the proposed deletion tag remains for five days, the article will be deleted. Seraphimblade 22:43, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to New Age music. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --19:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Malmö, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Thanks for uploading File:OD Talent - Rouse Circles.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:07, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ergosophy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable term, verging on neologism. Filtering for wikis and blogs gives on 17 ghits. Unreferenced. Fails WP:VER, WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. andy (talk) 08:46, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Business Intelegant has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no evidence of notability. Fails WP:N and WP:VER

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. andy (talk) 08:48, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you by any chance associated with this company? Could I then suggest WP:COI for reading, please. Tomas e (talk) 17:37, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]