User talk:Rideordieyoung

Hi Rideordieyoung! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Chris Brown discography, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Ss112 18:30, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You disregarded this again. The peaks are not sourced by the references at the top of the columns, so extra references are needed. I would not add them otherwise. Please stop doing this. Ss112 14:17, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this (followup note here), do not restore that material again. I made those cuts for valid reasons. WP:UNDUE and WP:BLP are policies. And not following WP:BLP will get you WP:Blocked. There are editors who would cut the entire section down to a paragraph or two (or just a little more than that). So you are not helping when you restore material like this; if I have to report this, a lot more of it is likely to be cut by others regardless of if it should be retained per WP:Preserve. So do not revert again. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 16:30, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Pills & Automobiles, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Hayman30 (talk) 14:24, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Pills & Automobiles shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Hayman30 (talk) 14:37, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

what are you talkin about man, you are the one who is removing sourced contents, adding personal opinions....--Rideordieyoung (talk) 14:39, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You continued to restore your changes despite my attempt to discuss with you. Hayman30 (talk) 14:56, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

everything is well-sourced and reliable tell me whats wrong--Rideordieyoung (talk) 14:58, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop referring your changes to the genre as "well-sourced and reliable" as they are not. See the message I left on my own talk page. Hayman30 (talk) 15:00, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

this one is good? is one of the most well known magazines in european music--Rideordieyoung (talk) 15:03, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Hayman30 (talk) 14:57, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]