User talk:Razorback2011
Sockpuppetry case
![]() |
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Razorback2011 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Redfarmer (talk) 13:50, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Use of multiple accounts
Please read WP:SOCK very carefully. As a rule, you should edit from one account and one account only. You may use alternative accounts (for example, for account security on insecure connections), but you must declare the connection and you must not use multiple accounts to give the appearance of them being more than one editor or to evade scrutiny of your actions. The same goes for "good hand/bad hand" socking, which is the use of one account to make edits that you don't want associated with you. If there is a repeat of this, you may find yourself blocked for a considerable length of time, but I have decided that a block is not necessary in this instance, which is unusual. The edit by Razorback2012 at the SPI basically admitting it tipped the balance against blocking you. I have indefinitely blocked the other accounts you used. If you have any other accounts that haven't been discovered, disclose them immediately and you will have immunity from sanctions as a result of those accounts and, if not, please don't create any more. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:57, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Tyler Wilson.jpg
![File Copyright problem](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/64px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Tyler Wilson.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 00:55, 27 November 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 00:55, 27 November 2010 (UTC)