User talk:Radmila Dragan

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jakob Christof Rad, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 11:01, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Chong Hon Nyan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  Waqar  (talk) 09:14, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, I will add links. Radmila Dragan (talk) 09:18, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone through your edits that you've done so far, reverted some and edited some of the others. A few notes. You have quite a few cases, such as Kappa Phi Lambda where you've linked an individual, but the person that the link is do is completely unrelated. The best changes that you've made are the additions of German Language references for certain articles. I'll be happy to go into greater depth on any of my reversions/changes.Naraht (talk) 14:29, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Samuel von Fischer. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 11:09, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I`ll check it Radmila Dragan (talk) 11:18, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just because a name exists in an article doesn't mean that it needs to be linked, sometimes it is someone doesn't have a page or even someone who isn't notable enough for a page. Also, even if there is someone with a *similar* name, it doesn't mean that that is the person.Naraht (talk) 13:20, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ivan Valeryevich Montik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivan Valeryevich Montik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:57, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]