User talk:PinkDucky91

Welcome!

Welcome...

Hello, PinkDucky91, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Finch (talk) 23:14, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding IMDB

IMDB is an unreliable WP:USERGENERATED source per WP:IMDB - please stop using it as a ref in articles. Waxworker (talk) 23:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Social (pragmatic) communication disorder

added a link pointing to Repeating

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mantain objectivity

Hi, it seems you have been doing a lot of edits that don't add any new content to pages/ correct mistakes, instead just change the way it is written in a way that affects the objectivity and unbiasedness of the article. please refer WP:NPOV, WP:SOAP and WP:LLM Shibui neko (talk) 00:59, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sherani District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sherani.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove Cleanup marker Hi, thanks for removing the bare URLs. If you clean the last one on an article, please don't forget to remove the
This article uses bare URLs, which are uninformative and vulnerable to link rot. Please consider converting them to full citations to ensure the article remains verifiable and maintains a consistent citation style. Several templates and tools are available to assist in formatting, such as reFill (documentation) and Citation bot (documentation). (Learn how and when to remove this message)
marker at the top of the page. Rofraja (talk) 10:14, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Look out for what reFill does!

I notice you're doing a lot of bare-URL fixes, many by using the reFill utility. One I stumbled over was this one which was a problem because it caused loss of essentially all information about the source (so I reverted it). This happened because reFill changed the URL to one without information as to the article, and thus lost all chance of using the "reference" to again find the source. Apparently reFill replaced the URL with the one that it is redirected to when the URL is used, which now goes to the base page of a related site instead of to the specific article. The actual article can still be found if one has the original URL by looking in an archive (e.g. archive.org) using that URL. It happens that reFill also destroyed the useful hand-coded information that was present in the original reference (that sort of identifies the source).
You need to be careful about "cleaning up" bare URLs. In particular, the original URL shouldn't be removed unless a replacement URL actually leads to an equivalent article, one containing the text which supports the points being made in the article referencing it. -- R. S. Shaw (talk) 23:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]