User talk:Pigsonthewing

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
(Redirected from User talk:PigsOTWing)

Bottom of Page

Talk to me, Andy Mabbett

  • If you post a message on this page, I'll reply on this page to avoid fragmenting the discussion.
  • If I've left you a message on your talk page, I will be watching it, so please reply there rather than here (but do feel free to drop a copy of {{Talkback}} here).
  • If appropriate, I will move discussion from here to the relevant article's talk page, so that anyone interested can join in.
  • If you want to start a new discussion thread, please start it at the bottom of the page. Better still, use the "new section" tab next to the "edit this page" tab, or the link at the foot of this section, either of which will do that automatically.
  • Please do not make links from within section headings.
  • Inaccessible HTML (coloured text, "small" tags, etc.) will be removed from this page on sight. Broken heading or list structures will be fixed.
  • Please sign and date your entries by inserting four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
  • Start a new discussion.



Wikidata weekly summary #641

Tech News: 2024-34

MediaWiki message delivery 00:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August thanks

story · music · places

Thank you for improving article quality in August! - Thank you for appreciating that I started Sarah Gibson, - it was tough, but nobody else did it. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:32, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vincenzo de Cotiis has been accepted

Vincenzo de Cotiis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rkieferbaum (talk) 00:14, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #641

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024 at Women in Red

Women in Red | September 2024, Volume 10, Issue 9, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 316, 317


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Rosiestep (talk) 19:02, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Tech News: 2024-35

MediaWiki message delivery 20:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perran Moon

Hello Andy, the outstanding COI issue on the Perran Moon article was the ongoing talk page discussion re: whether some criticism repeatedly removed by apparent COI users ought to be reinstated. That was the reason why I didn't remove the COI tag. My impression is that the tag ought to remain until that issue is resolved, but I would (as ever) be grateful for your thoughts. Best wishes, Axad12 (talk) 18:56, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I referred in my edit summary to the template's documentation, It requires "if you place this tag, you should promptly start a discussion on the article's talk page to explain what is non-neutral about the article". The discussion to which you refer does not justify the use of the template, Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:18, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for getting back to me on this Andy.
In fairness, the talk page discussion does note There seems to have been quite a lot of conflict of interest editing on this article recently and that With regard to the block of text (with reference) that has now been removed 3 times in the last 24 hours re: the subject's name... [lets] see if we can get some sort of consensus here.
So that does seem to me to be fairly clear re: what is non-neutral about the article and to be a genuine attempt at addressing it.
Admittedly the issue on non-neutrality is in relation to material that has been removed, rather than material which currently exists within the article, but the effect surely is the same.
There is an ongoing discussion taking place with a view to resolving that issue, so it does seem to me that the tag is merited in the short term and that I've done what the template documentation requires.
I'd therefore be grateful if you would consider either re-adding the tag, or allowing me to do so. Axad12 (talk) 03:03, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That reads more like "is the article non-neutral?" than "the article is non-neutral because...". Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's a very fair point. I'll take that on board for the future.
I looked at the edit history for that article earlier today and I think that Melcous has done a great job of reworking the contested material into something that both sides can probably agree on. That being the case, I suspect that any COI concerns are probably resolved, at least for the time being.
Thanks for your input here, much appreciated. Axad12 (talk) 14:38, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]