User talk:Peter.aremone

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2019 Delhi Temple attack, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Railfan23 (talk) 14:04, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Credible media links have been added.

https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/delhi-temple-attack-how-a-parking-scuffle-led-to-communal-tension-in-hauz-qazi-1560545-2019-07-02 Peter.aremone (talk) 15:03, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That source in no way supports the edits you made. Railfan23 (talk) 14:08, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The link is clear that Muslim man named Muhammad started the fight and brought his community Mobs, obviously MUSLIMS to vandalize the HINDU temple Peter.aremone (talk) 15:03, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly do not try to hide the truth.

I strongly suggest you read Wikipedia's core policies on verifiability and original research before editing further. Railfan23 (talk) 14:15, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Railfan23 (talk) 14:14, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 2019 Delhi Temple attack. Railfan23 (talk) 14:23, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Facts are facts, I kindly urge you to read the media link which are clear that the mob was Muslim.

It is clear that you are obfuscating facts by removing references to Muslims in the attacking group's identity

Kindly refrain from indulging in threats against me here railfan23 Peter.aremone (talk) 15:03, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 Delhi Temple attack. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You are welcome to have your say on the AFD, but only by making properly-formatted, policy-based arguments. Hugsyrup (talk) 14:59, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 Delhi Temple attack. Hugsyrup (talk) 15:15, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  caknuck _° needs to be running more often 16:45, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]