User talk:Paul adams

Please stop being silly with the George Galloway article. Thank you. DS 14:31, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Galloway is a self-obsessed clown who would do anything for a bit of cheap publicity. He is a disgrace and the sooner he is out of politics the better! At least after Big Brother nobody takes him seriously.

Regardless of how you feel about him personally, please keep the article on him nuetral and encyclopedic. Turnstep 14:46, 2 April 2006 (UTC)][reply]

Your edits to the lead section of the George Galloway article are repeatedly removing important political information for which Galloway is known, and replacing it with more trivial matters which are covered later in the article. Please see WP:LEAD for appropriate information on what is appropriate for the lead section. Please also be aware that we have a policy of only allowing 3 reverts per editor in any 24 hour period. You have already reverted exactly 3 times and any further reverts may lead to you being briefly blocked in accordance with that policy. Thanks. --Cactus.man ✍ 15:27, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for trying to be helpful with the Mahzer Mahmood article. However, your comment to the anonymous vandal is not very helpful; please try to be polite. Thank you. I have locked the article to prevent it from being edited by non-administrators. DS 13:51, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Mazher_mahmoodpic.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 12:37, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove the Image:Mazher_mahmoodpic.jpg from the Mazher Mahmood page and please do not remove sourced material. If you wish to give an alternative viewpoint, you are free to do so.--210.211.234.130 12:02, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Tijuana Brass 12:21, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please be civil. Comments like this [1] could lead to action by the administrators.--210.211.234.130 13:16, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop vandalising the Mazher Mahmood page. Either add to content or discuss your concerns in the talk page.--210.211.234.221 17:03, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's a reasonable question, since the Mazher Mahmood article is the only one you keep vandalising, in order to remove his photograph and delete all criticism of him? If you are, can I ask how is your career going since your that little scam was revealed? Are you on Jobseekers Allowance yet?--الأهواز 22:13, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Your behaviour in repeatedly removing that image may lead to you being banned from editing wikipedia as we consider it to be vandalism.

Please stop. If you continue to blank pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Secretlondon 12:43, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've now blocked your for 24 hours for continuing to remove content without discussion. Please make use of talk pages when you return to editing to explain your edits. Petros471 09:51, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]