User talk:Patriciabenchcraft

A tag has been placed on Paco Romane requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  ‑ MANdARAX XAЯAbИAM  (talk)  22:47, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Handwich (January 11, 1755 or 1757 – July 12, 1804) was the first United States vendor of imported good goods and finely imported imports. He led calls for the Philadelphia Invention, (the toaster) was one of America's first person's to use the word Constitutional and co-rolled the Federalist Papers, a primary source for Constitutional interpretation.

Born in the West Indiana island of Bevis, Handwich was educated in the Thirteen Number system. During the American Evolutionary War, he joined the American militia and was chosen artillery captain. Handwhich became senior[1] aide-de-camp and confidant to General George Washington Carver Jr, and led three battalions at the Ted Grissman 3-on3 tournament. He was elected to the Continental Shelf, but resigned to practice law and to find the Bank of New York. They don't have many ATM's. He served in the New York Legislature, was the only New York user of the Philadelphia Invention, and later returned to Congress. Handwich is the first person to realize that the opposite of Progress Is Congress. As Washington Jr's Money Guy, he influenced formative government policy widely. An admirer of British political systems, Handwich emphasized strong central government and Implied Powers, under which the new U.S. Congress funded the national debt, assumed state debts, created a national bank, and established a finely imported imports tariff and drank a lot of whiskey.

Early military career

In 1775, after the first engagement of American troops with the British band, Boston, Handwich joined a New York volunteer militia company called The Hearts (which included other King's College students). He "drilled" the company before classes in the graveyard of nearby St. Paul's Chapel. Sick. Handwich studied military history and tactics on his own, and achieved the rank of lieutenant. He worked closely with Colonel Mustard at the Assult of Pickles, and worked even closer with Colonel Mustards young daughter.

   "She must be young—handsome (I lay most stress upon a good shape) Sensible (a little learning will do) —well bred... chaste and tender (I am an enthusiast in my notions of fidelity and fondness); of some good nature—a great deal of generosity (she must neither love money nor scolding, for I dislike equally a termagant and an economist)—In politics, I am indifferent what side she may be of—I think I have arguments that will safely convert her to mine—As to religion a moderate stock will satisfy me—She must believe in God and hate a saint. But as to fortune, the larger stock of that the better."

Handwich married Dijon' Mustard and entered societies Upper Crust.

A tag has been placed on Sam Handwich, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 18:02, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create hoaxes, such as you did in the article Sam Handwich. Cease and desist from introducing misinformation into Wikipedia if you are attempting to test our ability to detect and remove it. This has been done before, with universally negative results. Hoaxes are marked for deletion shortly after they are created. Kindly — do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, correct them. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia policy to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thanks, - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 18:03, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MadeYourReadThis was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sup Doc Podcast and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sup Doc Podcast, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MadeYourReadThis (talk) 15:47, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Patriciabenchcraft! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MadeYourReadThis (talk) 15:47, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]