User talk:Pathuma 3553

Hello, I'm GMH Melbourne. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sam's Chicken without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GMH Melbourne (talk) 08:23, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sam's Chicken. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please do not remove properly sourced material without a proper discussion at Talk:Sam's Chicken as to why you believe the information should be removed. And do not add promotional material to the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sam's Chicken, you may be blocked from editing. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit to Sam's Chicken, you wrote an edit summary: Previous content was too old. We wan to updated content with our new informations. This implies that you are associated with Sam's Chicken, and therefore have a conflict of interest. Please read that linked guideline to understand the implications and limitations of editing with a conflict of interest. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You must stop adding promotional material to Sam's Chicken. If you continue, your editing will be brought to the attention of the administrators. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:27, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding Conflict of Interest, Promotion, sock-puppetry and edit warring. The thread is User:Pathuma 3553 at Sam's Chicken. The discussion is about the topic Sam's Chicken. Thank you. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Hammersoft (talk) 13:11, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]