User talk:Pascal.Tesson/Archive 15

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Pascal.Tesson. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archives

Up to July 2006 Aug. & Sept. 2006 Oct. 2006 Nov. 2006 Dec. 2006 Jan. 2007 Feb. 2007 Mar. 2007 Apr. 2007 May 2007 Jun. 2007 Jul. 2007 Aug. 2007 Sep. 2007 Oct. 2007 Nov.-Dec. 2007 Jan.-Apr. 2008 May.-Jul. 2008 Aug.-Oct. 2008 Nov.-Dec. 2008 Jan. 2009-Jul. 2010

If you think a better article can be made of it, I have no objection VID (TV Company) being restored. —tregoweth (talk) 01:59, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

the tag is placed there as part of the upload there is no meaningful assetion of own work.Genisock2 19:29, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Can you e-mail me with your e-mail address. You can probably guess who it's to do with. I've recieved a not so nice e-mail...... Davnel03 20:19, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Got your address, and have sent you e-mail back. Davnel03 20:25, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

it seems you hardly give any thought to helping me understand what exactly needs to be improved in order for it to be ok with you, and just delete it before I get a chance to say anything. I was going to add more info in order to make it "more relevant" as you requested, but since I have no clue what qualifies as information and what qualifies as advertising according to your mysterious standarts, I left it at that point. When I came back to fix it, you already deleted it, that's no way to explain yourself. Wikipedia has thousends of articles about softwares, take for example this article which has a screenshot and a link to the company's homepage. I haven't posted any links or screenshots and haven't advertised anything, so any "it's an ad" arguments you might have - fail. now you say it's not notable, but instead of helping you just delete it. I am in the process of improving the article and turning it into something "more relevant" ( whatever that means, 'cos you don't explain anything ). maybe trying to explain how to write an article instead of deleting it without giving a proper explanation would be more fitting to your position. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JeromeDaurdan (talk • contribs) 09:44, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi Pascal,

I'm confused. ViewOn.Tv is a system used in several countries with more than 4000 users (Not yet downloadable for some countries, but we are working on this). Like Joost, Babelgum companies I think this service has a place in Wikipedia, no ?

There is no difference, except we do not advertise in countries we do not support !

Maybe there is something we have to change in the page to have something more appropriate for encyclopedia ?

Please tell me

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Viewon01 (talk • contribs) 13:04, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello a user by the name of Davl103 has put a fake IP Block on my IP Page. HE HAS no admistrator privliges.Here is the evidence.63.3.10.1 18:53, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Um. Would it be considered a fake block? On a side note, I've had three e-mails about password change from Wikimedia, with someone from the above IP address wanting to change my password. Also, its not 63.3.10.1 IP page. It's 63.3.10.130 IP page. See this edit. Also. Thanks, Davnel03 14:17, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello there.

I see that you removed the speedy notice from the page, which of course was fair and proper as there is assertation of notability. I'm looking into whether or not this is a hoax, and my limited internet resources have left me dry so far. Considering you may have access to Lexus-Nexus or something of the sort, perhaps you might be able to find something? Otherwise I'm going to AfD the article in a couple days. I haven't given up hope, but there's little to be had left. Keegan^talk 04:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Good deal. This makes for a good example of why hoaxes are not speedy candidates but nonsense is, and the separation of the two. Keep up the good work, Pascal. Keegan^talk 03:02, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

I was trying to clean up one of User:Beko120's junk page moves, but made a hash of it. I tried to rename the old (and better) page (which was then a redirect) to a temp name to enable moving the page back to the old name. I stupidly hadn't remembered that it would just create a double redirect situation. The page in question is currently named BBC CBBC Channel and I was trying to get it back to just CBBC Channel. There's now a page I created called CBBC Channel (temp) that should be deleted.

Sorry for fouling this up and for having to bother you. I figured you were the right guy since you put a block on this pinhead's accounts, so you have at least a passing familiarity with his games.

Thanks. Majorclanger 00:32, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Have placed a request at WP:RM to sort this out. _TheIslander 00:40, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi Pascal,

Can you please explain why you would delete Computer Builders Warehouse, this company is the largest computer company in the state of michigan, you can check Intel, AMD, Microsoft website and find this company. The largest supplier of AMD in the Great Lakes Area. This company complies with the list of michigan based companies? This would be like deleteing Dell or Newegg.com or Tigerdirect from this website? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jrbreslin (talk • contribs) 04:22, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi Pascal,

I had nominated non-notable self photos for deletion but I guess you have reverted the tags. Can you please guide me if it is OK to upload self photos and advertise oneself? Thanks -- ¿Amar៛^{Talk to me/My edits} 11:22, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Pascal. Self-images are so few to come by, anyways.. -- ¿Amar៛^{Talk to me/My edits} 11:33, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for deleting the Wagner categories I created that should have been Richard Wagner ones.--Peter cohen 15:45, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Creators of Bradyosksa and Trevorrocks10. Want to deal with these boys? - CobaltBlueTony 16:54, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

hi, you've recently delteted this template [1] which is mentioned as a prime example for a policy violation under these ANIs - [2], [3] and this AN [4].

i have no idea regarding the protocols on such deletions when a case about them is still in progress, and i would request that you - a person with the admin tools that allow looking into deletion history - consider giving the ANI case a serious look (there's a lot of material there) and consider giving a 3rd opinion. Jaakobou^{Chalk Talk} 20:46, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

replied to you here. Jaakobou^{Chalk Talk} 21:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

		Ready to swab the deck!
		Another motley scallawag has joined the crew. Thanks for your comments at my RFA. Arrrgh! - - Jehochman Talk 02:55, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi - you (correctly) deleted a template I'd corrected and then blanked showing the claims on number of deaths in Jenin 2002. Can you comment on how I should have presented this information (which was a duplicate of something I created in Talk)? I want to make it permanently available from the article, but not give it WP:UNDUE. PR^talk 09:29, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

I appreciate your help, but I need it again, I would like to get a user page deleted, (under the right to vanish) I tried but the guy who's stalking me sees this and quickly deletes my request! Can you help me with this. This guy has made my life miserable with false accusations, constant emails for the last month or so with cyber-stalking. Please advise, I am terrified. good-bye (from a fellow Canadian, by the way my boyfriend went to McGill, its a beutiful school haha)198.96.80.15 19:45, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Well it would help if you told me what that userpage is. How am I supposed to guess? And who's stalking you? Pascal.Tesson 19:48, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

The message is from banned user Tweety21. Read up on her history here (with diffs galore). Precious Roy 15:41, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

I put it up for speedy delete ealrier but nobody deleted it ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 23:08, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

We now have many images in the article and this image was unsuitable. Seems as I uploaded I think I have every right to put it up for speedy ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 23:11, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

You asked me to let me know of any vandalism by StealBoy or his sockpuppets.

I'm not sure if this is the same, but there have been some odd additions to Cosgrove Hall Films just recently.

Regards,

Lynbarn 14:17, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. Blocked the two IPs involved. Pascal.Tesson 14:32, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello, Pascal.Tesson ... you recently deleted the sandbox User:72.75.70.147/Deletion warnings after I tagged it with {{db-userreq}} ... would you please check my recent contributions and delete those other tagged sandboxes from previous IP accounts as well? The current versions are archived as sandboxes under a registered account ... Thnx! —68.239.76.49 (talk · contribs) 14:37, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Beau coup thanks for the quick response ... would you also please zap the two that I've found and tagged since then? —68.239.76.49 19:35, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello Pascal.Tesson, I just wanted to say thanks for doing such a great job on editing stuff on Wikipedia. I especially enjoyed the revisions ON EVERY article you did. Great job, keep up the great work!

Cheers, Goldenstatewarroirs —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldenstatewarroirs (talk • contribs) 22:11, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Eherm Hello. I want to tell you somthing. Well you are an administrator so you can do things that I can't do. I'm likeing a nomination for adminship but I can't go on that page becuse I've got this Net Nanny internet security and I don't know the password. Okay this is going to be real simple! All you have got to do is go to the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship page and go to nominate and got to Nominate someone else and leave me to fill in the qustions and notify me on my talk page and have my requst for adminship link and when I've filled It in I'll notify you again and you put it on the Requsts for adminship page. Cheers! Robbie williams star 24576 17:50, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

I've just uploaded some photos of Montreal (despite being probably Canada's most photogenic city, it seems very poorly served image-wise). However, I don't know the city particularly well; can you have a look at the images here and make sure I've captioned them correctly, before I make a fool of myself? — iridescent (talk to me!) 22:33, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi Pascal,

Last month you deleted this article that I created under CSD:G11. I believe that the deletion was not in order as the article was not spam or advertising (although some editors subsequent to myself had added in rather a lot about the menu) and should have been trimmed not deleted. Will you consider restoring the article? If you do and let me know I will trim out the spam and improve it. If not, I will list it at WP:DRV. Stifle (talk) 11:44, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Why did you ban User:Ps3ps3? That user did not commit any crime!! He is innocent and I command you to lift that ban or else! If you are wondering, I am not his friend, but protecting those who did nothing wrong. You are abusing your authority to ban other users. You are unjust and not fair! Think about it: Are you doing the right thing by banning those who are innocent?

Cheers, Goldenstatewarroirs 01:08, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello, I removed redirect because the targeted article does not cover spot zoning. Spot zoning is sufficiently complex and distinguishable from zoning proper to warrant its own article. If it should be included into zoning later on after spot zoning article has been completed, then a merge would be appropriate.

After I removed the redirect I saw that you're an admin. Can you remove the vandalism banner? The editor who initially put it up did so in error, which he mentions on the article's talk page. Thank you.EECavazos 14:50, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello. I think that User:MoritzB has gone too far. On Race and intelligence he inserted an extremely offensive quote from a Sunday Times interview with James D. Watson. I am sure that MoritzB is quite aware that the quote generated a furore in Britain with statements by government ministers and a cancelled event at the science museum in London. Watson was forced to retract the statement and make a public apology; yet the quote remained in the article. MoritzB quietly sat by without making further comment. I am appalled that an editor thinks that obvious unscientific tittle-tattle like this, from somebody who is well-known to be intentionally outspoken and provocative, is suitable for this encyclopedia. MoritzB has not responded on either the article discussion page or on his own talk page. It would seem from this that MoritzB has a definite racist agenda, which smacks of the far right. Can anything be done? --Mathsci 06:12, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

In reply to your comment on my talk page: I am far too busy in real life to do what you suggested. You did not do so yourself last time you made a report about MoritzB on WP:AN/I. Do special laws apply to you? --00:54, 21 October 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathsci (talk • contribs)

I'm sorry if this seemed rude or abrupt. The main point was to keep you informed, since you had expressed your own misgivings on a previous occasion. Your reluctance to intervene is completely understandable. Cheers, Mathsci 16:06, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

What do these articles say? You deleted them. I am curious. Archtransit 19:03, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Oh! If it's copyrighted, I'll remove it above and from my user talk page (even though it's just an excerpt. Archtransit 15:12, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed this article got nuked last week. Razor & Tie is a highly notable record company; could you please userfy me a copy of the deleted article so I can rewrite it? Thanks. Chubbles 15:29, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

I agree - while R&T isn't particularly well known, it's a very significant label in the mid-90s indie scene as it was the US label for a number of significant UK & Canadian bands, and the article doesn't seem particularly spammy - I'll userify it to User:Chubbles/Razor & Tie — iridescent 15:33, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Actually, I deleted it because it had just been recreated by a spammer. I have no objections to re-creation provided it is correctly referenced. Pascal.Tesson 15:36, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

You deleted a page titled "Patrick Norman", stating copyright infringement. I am to author of the article, biography, his website, and I am his wife. We (Patrick Norman & myself) own all of the rights (all right reserved et al.)for any and all things relating to his projects "Patrick Norman" and "Patrick Norman Music". As an owner and founding member of the band "Rusted Root", Patrick Norman also owns all copyrights (all right reserved, et al.) pertaining to his band Rusted Root. This article was created to give readers an accurate biography of Patrick Norman, not only as a solo artist, but also a current member of Rusted Root. What is needed to have the page undeleted, and linked properly to the page titled "Rusted Root". Please advise, thank you. IMuseProductions 03:26, 24 October 2007 (UTC)IMuseProductions

I believe you misinterpreted the license for the image at Flikr, please look again, and restore the image. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 14:22, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

The flickr license for this photo has changed from {{cc-by-nc-2.0}} to {{cc-by-2.0}}, so it is now acceptable. You should note, however, that this image was previously uploaded twice in contravention of Wikipedia image use policies. Richard, please be more careful in the future. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 14:36, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

It's now at the Commons, so undeletion is unnecessary. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 14:41, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Dearest Opposer,

Pascal, I always check the images I delete using the Bad Old Ones Tool. I never do it blindly; the time when I do that is when hell freezes over. Twinkle is just a tool that does deletions all a time, after I've inspected the category I want to delete. --Maxim_{(talk) (contributions)} 20:46, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

You cited "Blatant advertising. Pages which exclusively promote some entity and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic." But you excised the following sentence, "Note that simply having a company or product as its subject does not qualify an article for this criterion." And that's all it was. The page was deleted months before, at which point it was advertising (not my creation at that time). The page I put up was simply information. It contained not a single value judgment regarding the quality of the product. Please undelete. Lucy1981 07:13, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello. Thanks for fulfilling my Editprotected request on {{Infobox Officeholder}}. However, I need to bother you again because there was apparently a little copy-paste error during the update (diff): the second SPAN (applied on {{{honorific-suffix}}}) should have stayed as "honorific-suffix" instead of becoming a second "honorific-prefix". Could you tweak it? Thanks in advance, — Komusou ^talk @ 13:28, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for supporting my recent RfA. It was successful, and I was promoted to Administrator today. I appreciate the support! — KieferSkunk (talk) — 23:10, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

very confused as to why this page was deleted along with the Bozinism page. many hours of work right down the drain, and explanation would be nice at the very least. 8:40pm oct 28 2007

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Boz http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bozinism

Please restore User:Shmede userpage. You have removed copyrighted information without the user's permission. If the information is not restored then I will not hesitate to take legal action. Regards, 86.162.12.192 15:36, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Right... Quoting from Wikipedia:Free speech,

In short, Editing Wikipedia is a privilege, not a right; there is no right to edit Wikipedia. As difficult as it is to accept, and as harsh as it sounds to say it, there are only two rights on Wikipedia: the right to fork and the right to leave.

Wikipedia is not MySpace, if you want free web-space for you and your friends, you're just knocking on the wrong door. Please also not that legal threats on Wikipedia are a definite no-no, though yours is probably too comical to be considered as much of a nuisance. Pascal.Tesson 16:45, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

I have several friends of mine who would pull your case apart if you were not to give us our information back. Regards, 86.162.12.192 17:07, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Then I suggest you turn to them. I'm sure they'll get a kick out of your whining. I don't. Pascal.Tesson 18:12, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

I have done, and they are doing thanks. You won't get a kick out of anything sat taking the fun out of everyone's lives on Wikipedia. 86.162.12.192 18:25, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

NO LONGER MATTERS LOSERS, WE HAVE IT BACK FROM OUR GREAT TRUSTED FRIENDS AND IT WILL BE BACK ALL OVER WIKIPEDIA!86.162.12.192 18:55, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

I've moved the Missing Men of Saturn stub into the main namespace. I'd like to include the image now as well. Thanks!  :) FusionKnight 02:19, 30 October 2007 (UTC)