User talk:OperaJaws

Good evening, I agree that the IP user should have not blanked your revisions in regards to Jameis Winston. I have made a minor edit with regard to your sources and what has been reported over the last several days. There has been no report that he was was accused. He was involved with the sexual assault, how no one but the lawyers and the state attorney knows at this time. I have removed the words against, and replaced them with involved. It follows the situation and the news more accurately. Also a source alleging a police cover-up is something that as I mentioned in the edit show poor journalistic judgment running from a TMZ article that was published. TMZ is a first an foremost an entertainment tabloid. AP and USA Today have not followed suit with that news story and should be carefully sourced if at all. Thanks for your edit. Nolephin (talk) 00:21, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article SkinPro has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

all the sources seem to be press releases or otherwise from the company itself. There is nothing that indicates that the company is notable. I couldn't find anything independent or reliable in web searches either. See WP:CORP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 09:37, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]