User talk:Nant Sych

January 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hasland has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Hasland was changed by Nant Sych (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.972453 on 2015-01-26T17:52:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:52, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Na Na Na (Na Na Na Na Na Na Na Na Na). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Na Na Na (Na Na Na Na Na Na Na Na Na) was changed by Nant Sych (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952626 on 2015-01-26T17:55:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:55, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mensa International, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Mensa International was changed by Nant Sych (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.97408 on 2015-01-26T17:56:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:56, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Forest School (Horsham), you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Forest School (Horsham) was changed by Nant Sych (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85611 on 2015-01-26T17:58:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:58, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Weegeerunner (talk) 18:00, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:05, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nant Sych (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Don't go there, girl's friend! Nant Sych (talk) 19:54, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Diannaa (talk) 20:02, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|I have learned my lesson and will not make any more disruptive edits. Nant Sych (talk) 20:10, 26 January 2015 (UTC)}}[reply]

OK, I am willing to consider unblocking, but what edits will make if you are unblocked? Since so far your editing has been 100% vandalism, we need a much clearer idea of what you are likely to do than just "will not make any more disruptive edits". The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 22:47, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|In that case fuck off. Nant Sych (talk) 17:46, 27 January 2015 (UTC)}}.[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.