User talk:Mullers

Thank you for experimenting with the page Hot on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Kind Regards - Heligoland | Talk | Contribs 23:54, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are writing a lot on the article Michael Muldoon. The information in it appears to be fictitious. I intend to nominate it for deletion soon if I can find nothing to verify MIchael Muldoon even exists. - Shadowin 21:28, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greets again. Sorry for the trouble I caused you. I hope you continue contributing hard to find information! - Shadowin 00:08, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate it sir! Its nice to know that people actually concern themselves to loak for hoaxes. I hope the matter can be put to bed. Mullers 00:17, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Sean Muldoon, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Sean Muldoon. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. You might also look at Wikipedia:Criteria_for_inclusion_of_biographies Jd2718 08:19, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DSC01293.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:54, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Muldoon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Muldoon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 18:16, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]