User talk:Mtong14/sandbox

Everything in the article appears to be relevant to the topic, I wasn't distracted by anything.

Everything in the article appears to be neutral.

Something that I think may be slightly understated is the reason as to why he chose to selected the title "untitled" for most of his pieces.

Citations appear good.

I do believe that there are some statements within the works sections at the beginning that look like they may require a citation, such as the one referring to the TIME magazine article with the amount of people killed by gunshots, I'm not sure if the date is referring to the amount of people during that time or the time frame which he pays homage, it's a little unclear for me but it seems as it's referring to the amount of people during that date but I think it can be written in a more concise way.

Other than what I've mentioned I believe the article appears well, is well supported.

It could use some minor grammar and punctuation editing, besides that looks great.