User talk:MikeRRRRRRRIGHT
Please do not vandalize Wikipedia articles. Georgia guy (talk) 18:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
MikeRRRRRRRIGHT (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
EAT A DICK I am the one fixing the fucking article bitch and FUCKFACES I DID NOT VANDALIZEE I WAS FIXING THE ARTICLE, AND NOW ITS FUCKED UP AGAIN
Decline reason:
Unless you are able to make your request in a civil manner (see WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA, it will not be considered. — Yamla (talk) 18:31, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Note: This user hasn't provided and unblock reason, but I put the sentences that he/she put around the unblock request as the reason. Admins: I don't think you should grant this request... --The Helpful One (Review) 18:25, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- For the record, his edit to Dwyane Wade was perfectly justified. Someone had added misinformation about Wade's height, and he removed it. He also removed a poorly written and redundant section about Wade's early life. Just look at what he actually did. Wade is not 7'4", as can be confirmed with a three second Google search. I don't condone this user's language, but I understand why he's upset. Zagalejo^^^ 18:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- There's no reason why a user's first edit should be trumpted with profanity and personal attacks. However justified his vandalism correction was, every single edit he's made has been agressive and uncivil. Snowfire51 (talk) 18:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed. Someone who uses the word "faggot" probably doesn't have a long future here. I just think people should be more careful when undoing people's edits. Zagalejo^^^ 18:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- There's no reason why a user's first edit should be trumpted with profanity and personal attacks. However justified his vandalism correction was, every single edit he's made has been agressive and uncivil. Snowfire51 (talk) 18:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- For the record, his edit to Dwyane Wade was perfectly justified. Someone had added misinformation about Wade's height, and he removed it. He also removed a poorly written and redundant section about Wade's early life. Just look at what he actually did. Wade is not 7'4", as can be confirmed with a three second Google search. I don't condone this user's language, but I understand why he's upset. Zagalejo^^^ 18:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
