User talk:Mesrkanloo Exchange

Welcome!

Hello, Mesrkanloo Exchange, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Mesrkanloo International Exchange, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content protocols, and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are struck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! creffett (talk) 13:25, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Mesrkanloo Exchange (talk) 09:04, 6 June 2020 (UTC));[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Mesrkanloo International Exchange

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Mesrkanloo International Exchange has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. creffett (talk) 13:25, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. creffett (talk) 13:25, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mesrkanloo Exchange (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

sana_mesrkanloo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

my old username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is against policy

Decline reason:

That would be acceptable as a username, but you have not addressed your inappropriate edits or told what you will edit about instead. Please review WP:COI and WP:PAID. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:16, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Mesrkanloo Exchange (talk) 10:30, 6 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mesrkanloo Exchange (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

sana_mesrkanloo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

we will use this account to publish information about the company like company history, service, achievement etc. we will not use this account for any kind of advertisement or publicity.

Decline reason:

No. That would be a violation of WP:COI and WP:PAID and WP:PROMO. Yamla (talk) 10:42, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Help me to creating my company page in Wikipedia, I am new here & its look difficult for me. Thank you.

We aren't interested in having you do that. --Yamla (talk) 10:42, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mesrkanloo Exchange (talk) 11:31, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mesrkanloo Exchange (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please unblock (Mesrkanloo Exchange user to post information about the company name as Mesrkanloo International exchange. The creation of this user to create page about the company to provide information about the company and not for the any kind of advertising or publicity. The information which will publish on this page is general information about the company.

Decline reason:

You have been told multiple times that you can not use Wikipedia to write about your company. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:56, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is a clear case of WP:IDHT and WP:CIR. You've already been told you won't be unblocked to do that. Another admin will be along shortly to review your unblock request, but this is the end of the line for you. --Yamla (talk) 11:33, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.