User talk:Meetteju
Image copyright problem with Image:Sagarbg1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sagarbg1.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 13:10, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging for Image:Railfantag1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Railfantag1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:07, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Your recent additions to Railfan
In your recent contributions to Railfan, I must question some of your additions.
First of all, regarding Image:Railfantag.jpg, I don't see how the photo adds much to the article, as it's a photo not of a special railfan-related plate design, but rather just someone's custom lettering on a standard plate. It seems to fit Vanity plate quite well, but I don't see the fit for the railfan article.
Secondly, regarding Image:Railfantag1.jpg, it's a great image, save for that pesky datestamp in the corner (though someone proficient in Adobe Photoshop could edit that out). However, your description to go with the article is quite POV (see WP:NPOV for why this is important). The description needs a rewrite to be more neutral. Additionally, regarding the same image, you never specified the source of the image. If you took it yourself, you'll need to say so, and specify which free license you're releasing it under. Two popular licenses are the GNU Free Documentation License (add {{GFDL}} to the description if that's what you want to do), and the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 license (add {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to the description if that's what you want to do). If you did not take the image yourself, you'll need to identify the source, and add the proper tags for it. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:27, 12 July 2006 (UTC)