User talk:Mctoxic88

Hello, Mctoxic88! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 02:12, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images • create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Football in Serbia has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://i46.tinypic.com/21ltkll.png (matching the regex rule tinypic\.com). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:12, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mctoxic88! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Novak Djokovic that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:21, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Novak Djokovic, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Djokovic does not have a monopoly on greatest by a long shot. Plus Tennis Project consensus is to keep water cooler stuff in the legacy section not the lead Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:27, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Đoković is Greatest Male Tenniser of All Time. It's not for discucsion, it's a fact! Every revert you do, I am going to again and again to add same sentence. Mctoxic88 (talk) 09:13, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | tålk 09:04, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm referring to your legal threat here. Bishonen | tålk 09:05, 23 August 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  So what? I am wrong? Why are you keep destroying your own rules?!

  You are now breaking First Amendment to the United States Constitution by not allowing free speach.

  I had no other options but to write like that, because one user constantly blatantly destroying rules which are established! Just want sentence to be preserved like it is because it is actual fact referenced by your rules! Mctoxic88 (talk) 09:12, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My idea with providing you a link to Wikipedia:No legal threats was for you to click on that link. Try that now, to see an answer to your question "So what?". Here it is again: Wikipedia:No legal threats. As for free speech, you're not free to say whatever you like on Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:Free speech. Bishonen | tålk 09:21, 23 August 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Again you are wrong. Which can be very easy proven in my favour in court, if I want to sue wikimedia organisation! You are not above the law, nor wikimedia!

How you can't allow me free speach? What a dictatorship is that?

So you blocked me now and I can't do now edit or do anything? How can I unblock myself now? There is no way. Oh, well I gonna make thousands of accounts. Not a problem.

But you didn't block other user who keeps revereting my page edit, which is all done by Wikipedia guidelines. Why wikimedia can't acknowedlege truth and facts. Please to consider and other administrators of puting correct and factual stuff on wikipedia not political ideology which you obivously do. Mctoxic88 (talk) 10:22, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mctoxic88! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Novak Djokovic several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Novak Djokovic, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 09:18, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I did. I and will do that until you acknowedlge FACT and truth! Not your fantazy bizzare ideology. Novak Đoković is greatest men's player of all time and that's proven fact! It doesn't need some fake concensus on some wikipedia...So we gonna have concensus about for example is earth flat or not?!

If there is factualy stated in Legacy part, why can't be in introductory text? Mctoxic88 (talk) 10:26, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

 Bishonen | tålk 11:12, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]