User talk:Matrix789

November 2019

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Doug Weller talk 19:43, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

why I was blocked ?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Matrix789 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Is it possible to know the reason why I was blocked ? Users abuse their censorship rights and must be accountable or banned from wikipedia. It is because of these people that wikipedia became a fake new site. I REQUEST TO BE UNLOCKED 81.67.166.149 (talk) 08:48, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The block is now expired. However, with an attitude such as you are displaying, you will likely be given a longer block quickly unless you change it. This is a collaborative environment where you must work with others of differing views in a civil manner. Wikipedia is not a news site, "fake" or otherwise. Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources state about article subjects. In addition, this is a privately operated website that has the right to dictate what is said here as it sees fit, just as you can dictate what others say and do in your residence. See WP:FREESPEECH. 331dot (talk) 09:52, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

--Matrix789 (talk) 18:46, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's incredible, but who controls blocking on this site? before blocking someone is there a study? People give themselves the right to mark anything.

The reason for your block and who made it is noted above. 331dot (talk) 18:49, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PROBLEME

I have problems with some people who take advantage of their small power on wikipedia to propagate idiocy. these idiots come from the lack of cultures and discernment of these people. I invite you see in the Southern Europe article to check the informations. How can people like this have the power to censor or block users ? I would like to know where it is possible to complain to take away their right to these people. User:Dr.K. User:Binksternet Moreover I am not against the dialogue it would be a pleasure to debate with ignorant but the lack of arguments make that they censor and lie in order to prevent any dialogue.