User talk:Master of Puppets/Talk/Archive/Archive3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

User:Master of Puppets/Archhead User:Master of Puppets/Header




about the monobook

ILovEPlankton 06:30, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MySpace reversion

No, but this does and I didn't spend a lot of time checking again when the same IP edited again just minutes later. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SnappingTurtle (talkcontribs) 19:44 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your welcome notice

Graphics and stuff

Tricksy camouflage! Hey, that's really spiffy! I tried to cobble together a poor little table to hold it in, haha.Thanks so much! And I just got the joke behind your Mop userbox ;p FAE 03:14, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, I love it, it's awesome! Made me laugh. Thanks! FAE 06:54, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
My first pseudo-barnstar! I'll wear the badge proudly, as I've been a night owl all my life. I'm horribly addicted to the internet, and that fact on top of my propensity for late nights makes for lots of Wiki-ing. Thanks so much :) FAE 07:31, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Hills Have Eyes

Star Wars isn't a disambiguation page, but a lengthy topic covering all aspects of the franchise. I don't think there's enough material to warrant three articles on the Hills Have Eyes, but wouldn't object to the original and the remake being merged into a single The Hills Have Eyes article. Of course, that's not usually how things work. Morwen - Talk 14:12, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Vandalism

Hmm yes, it's fine with me. Of course there is no guarantee a certain admin is going to be online, so there's no guarantee of a quick response. You could always try posting at WP:AIV, which is patrolled by several admins and is more likely to get a quicker response. FireFoxT [21:17, 16 March 2006]

Places subpage

Thanks re rvv.

  • I award you this plate of cookies for reverting vandalism on my talk page. Many thanks!
    I award you this plate of cookies for reverting vandalism on my talk page. Many thanks!

- File:Ottawa flag.png nathanrdotcom (TCW) 22:56, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tawkerbot2

Thanks for the warm Esperanza welcome

Yes, I've seen the UBs stacked in IE - I use firefox, and don't have problems. I dont think that I want to stack them, lets leave them as is for now, maybe I can work out the problem. BTW, quick question: should I reply here, or on my talk page? Whats proper (/good etiquette)? And I would be interested in using the online/offline thing (I saw it on your user page), but I'll have to contact you later, as i've got to get going. Anyway, nice meeting you. TTYL, -Reuvenk[T][C] 05:36, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
So that's what I'll do. -Reuvenk[T][C] 05:40, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, are you really 14 years old?!?! (Your userpage says so) -Reuvenk[T][C] 05:53, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly, I dont hold your age against you (I'm only 17). I'm amazed though that a fourteen year old turned out to be as polite/helpful/knowledgeable as you are. OK, its 1 AM, so I'm going to bed.-Reuvenk[T][C] 05:59, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I installed the online/offline thing and added it to my userpage. Thanks. And see the list of welcomes in other languages. -Reuvenk[T][C] 19:27, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quite a generous offer for the image - how do you have so much time for Wikipedia? And BTW, I love lego, so that might be a place to start. Thanks, -Reuvenk[T][C] 06:15, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! -Reuvenk[T][C] 17:16, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image offer

Your Congrats Message

Re:Welcome

Me too, Thanks a lot! .. ... Though I do wonder...will I get welcome messages from EVERY member of esperanza, and then have to go and thank each and every one of them?--Zaorish 06:29, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Blocked IP

Gosh, no need to apologise! I was just letting you know for future information and a bit of reassurance. Thanks for your comments on the colour scheme, it's lovely isn't it! (I can say that, as it's not my work). --kingboyk 18:56, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome

See Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Squidward:
This person uses open proxies to vandalize seemingly random articles, replacing article content with a picture of Squidward and the edit summary "SQUIDWARD!" Attacks are coordinated, with multiple IPs making rapid edits almost simultaneously.
Such IPs are to be blocked indefinitely on sight. Sango123 (e) 19:09, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, definitely. The IP's he used have been blocked 48 hours each, with few warnings. Sango123 (e) 19:18, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Hey, thanks for the greeting! Deckiller 19:42, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Heh, I made a signature with the green "E" in it. Deckiller 19:50, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Cool, thanks for the tip ^_^ — Deckiller 19:58, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to you as well

Hey

By the way, have you thought about working on the Star Wars WikiProject? We could use all the great editors we could get! I'm going to launch an "reduce fancruft!" drive pretty soon, heh ^_^ — Deckiller 23:42, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Status changer

Yeah, it's really nifty. It's amazing what kind of things people can make for Wikipedia. --Buchanan-Hermit™..CONTRIBS..SPEAK! 00:18, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the hint

Thanks

Not for another few weeks :) — Deckiller 03:07, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think I'll be okay, though I plan on taking Tuesday or Wednesday off ^_^ — Deckiller 03:13, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, welcome to WPSW! — Deckiller 03:20, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sith

Hi.

LOL! The Wookieepedian 04:02, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it depends on the amount of information you have on the subject. I say yes if you have. But otherwise, it should be added to one of the lists. I suggest that you first make a subpage and write the article on it, and then we'll look over it and tell ya what we think. The Wookieepedian 04:12, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I will thank you in my native language: RRRAAAAARRRRRRGUE!!!` :P The Wookieepedian 05:08, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vibroblade/vibrosword

Re: Cheating

Thanks for the open invite. I 'stalk' pretty much everyone here. If I interact with you once, I don't remove your page from my watchlist. Also, people I see around this place and respect, usually get added. Especially vandal fighters, so when a vandal gets antsy on their pages, I can revert it quickly. tv316 04:31, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, we're a lot alike. I don't know anything, so I couldn't write an article even if it meant losing my beloved rollback button. I stick to what I know, and that's reverting vandalism, and recently, fixing spelling in articles. You'd be surprised how many random spelling errors there are hidden in this place. And if you're not yet asleep from that, I'll tell you about my fabulous paint drying adventures. Little known fact: Canadian paint freezes before it dries. tv316 04:44, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


REALLY QUESTION NEED HELP NOW, CAN U BAN ME FOR SWEARING OR USING PROFANITY? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacky1234 (talkcontribs)

THANKS I GOT LK 10 WARNINGS AND THEY EACH SAY LAST WARNING...wait u can ban me with ip address right —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacky1234 (talkcontribs)


can I?(ban people) for defacing their pages, what does deface mean—Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacky1234 (talkcontribs)

how du u become one —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacky1234 (talkcontribs) can you teach me —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacky1234 (talkcontribs)

Can u describe knowing the in and outs and be a part of the community? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacky1234 (talkcontribs)
Whopper if ur reading this im srryyy ROFL —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacky1234 (talkcontribs)

Thanks

WP:AIV

Arg... you got the save and delete ones mixed up... I hate vandals. The now-deleted Nathan Sean MetcalfeTricks of the Windows Game Programming Gurus contained the edit histories since the article's creation and was the one to be saved. The current Tricks of the Windows Programming Gurus is a copy and paste version that should've been trashed. And Nathan Sean Metcalfe has nothing to do with the article at all except for being the target of the vandal's harassment; I could show you some of the past edits wherein the vandal has named this individual, except they're now deleted. Tijuana Brass 06:12, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
And while we're at it, User:Dead-man-walking is the name the vandal finally decided to create. I'd suggest indefinitely blocking him, as he's vandalized for over three months now without showing any intention of stopping. Tijuana Brass 06:13, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There's plenty of reason to block him -- it's clearly a sock of the guy who's been vandalizing the article for months. But again, while your corrections were, of course, done with the best intentions, you tagged the wrong article for a speedy, and now the edit history is gone -- along with the means for me to show you past edits by the user, at least until it's restored. Tijuana Brass 06:22, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's an understandable mistake. Because either the vandal, User:Dead-man-walking, or the editor who tried to correct him, User:Attakmint, did a cut-and-paste, the article with the history was the one deleted, and the existing one is actually the new article. It's an oversight I would have made as well, since one may not typically think to check the histories of mirrored articles before listing one for deletion... but it does mean that we need to move the issue to WP:DRV. Tijuana Brass 06:29, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate the assistance, but I'm not sure if I agree with your assessment. In the past three months, he's vandalized this article well over 30 times. And in any case, if an article has been erroneously deleted, it needs to be restored. I'd rather you list it at WP:DRV, given that you have more experience than I do (and deleted it, after all), but I don't think brushing it aside with the hope that a persistent vandal will "give up" is the best thing to do. Tijuana Brass 06:35, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, believe me, the Esperanza tag on your sig gets my vote of confidence any day, as far as being an agreeable editor. Let me suggest something easier for both of us... tagging the article with a Watch. I'd be on him being back within two weeks. I suppose I'm grateful it's always just a simple revert to fix things. Thanks for the late-night dialogue... gave me something to do. Tijuana Brass 06:43, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The advice was welcome. Besides, I'm procastinating too. ...and I love coffee. Tijuana Brass 06:52, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wampus cat

ello there, Ms.Kahn. I was just wondering if I may ask about an issue I have with you; it is concerning the article Wampus cat.

Hello, First why do have an issue with me, I do not think we have interacted before? Second, although I do not live in any of the US states mentioned in the article I am fairly certain that this article is totally bogus. Surely it would have come up in biology 101. I was unaware of the article and to my knowledge have never edited it. Thanks.--Dakota ~ ° 07:42, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again. I've got it from a high authority (I am at work right now) from a co-worker who is from Georgia ( a state mentioned as a habitat if this bogus creature) that this is bull and he has never heard of it. It is a non existant creature. I would do a db-nonsense or whatever template fits it. I will do the honors if you should wish. Thanks--Dakota ~ ° 07:55, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Gone db-nonsense. By the way your talk page is beautiful. Thanks.--Dakota ~ ° 08:03, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I do like it, if I didn't I would not comment. I see Sango's influence in the design. She is awesome and I have told her so. Thanks--Dakota ~ ° 08:22, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In answer to your last question, no. It is a school stub and I have never seen one deleted myself. BTW (Something made up in school one day [1]. It must be some sort of mythological school mascot. One of the high schools I attended had a Dragon for a mascot. At any rate that article was so totally bogus. Would not be surprised to see it comeback. Thanks.--Dakota ~ ° 09:00, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Monobook troubles

Your support is needed..!!!

Hii...

Sorry about this....but a page Spawn Man had created and put as a sub-page on his user page has been put up on AfD.... i really see nothing wrong in the page but still people are fighting over it.... and SpawnMan has lost all faith in Wikipedia.... It'd really be nice of you if you could lend your support to Keep the page....as it does not violate any rules of user pages... any kind of support would be truly appreciated...... Thanks a lot!!! Jayant,17 Years, Indiacontribs 17:49, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

500!

Hi MoP! I just completed 500 edits in Wikipedia. I owe it all to guys like you who have helped me & kept me motivated enough to reach this target. I would like to award you this Wikicookie.

Thanks

Srikeit(talk ¦ ) 01:11, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Beatles

RE: Umm... what is this edit? It seems that you were trying to revert some vandalism, but instead reverted to a vandalised revision. M o P 16:03, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I or popups got the wrong revision. Things were happening so quickly there that it looks like two of us were trying to revert at the same time. . . Thanks for catching it. John (Jwy) 16:09, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

Re Vandals

WPSW

Vibroblades article

right.