User talk:Markrune

Hi! I moved the article you created to User:Markrune/Naked Lunch (UK band) so you can work on addressing the issues brought up by the other editor. The problem is that we have no coverage in reliable sources (WP:RS) to show that this band is notable. Reliable sources are things such as reviews and coverage about the band in things such as newspapers, notable music websites, or notable magazines. Things such as album covers or personal interviews with the band are not usable as reliable sources. The album is seen as a WP:PRIMARY source and the problem with information you provide is that we can't verify how reliable of a source you are. I don't mean that to sound like I'm trying to say that you'd deliberately provide wrong information, but Wikipedia has very strict standards about showing notability and verifying sources. Word of mouth simply isn't enough. I have more about notability standards and such here, if you're interested.

I also would recommend against posting sentences such as "It was an interesting evening.....", as that's not written in a manner that's considered to be encyclopedic. Articles must be written neutrally and in an encyclopedic tone. Any other format just isn't acceptable. I know that's strict, but it has to fall within the guidelines for all of the articles here. Another thing I recommend is that you include information such as the band members' names. You've got to remember that incoming editors will likely not be familiar with the band and will want to know these basic things.

In any case, I moved it to your userspace so you can have more time to work on it at your leisure. I just have to warn you that often times it's nearly impossible to find coverage for niche bands, especially those that were from the pre-internet era. I recommend that you look into getting help from Wikipedia:WikiProject Music, a group that's devoted to improving music related pages. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:32, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Markrune! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Naked Lunch (UK band).
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Hasteur (talk) 14:48, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Naked Lunch (UK band), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~KvnG 01:18, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hard Corps (English band) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Punk, EBM, Classics and Rarities 80-89 |publisher=Strut-records.com |date= |accessdate=2014-03-06}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:05, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hard Corps (English band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel Miller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article She Made Me Do It has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Harry the Dog WOOF 10:46, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article She Made Me Do It has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references. Probably fails WP:GNG as I can't find any independent, reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Harry the Dog WOOF 11:01, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles require reliable, independent sources. Do not remove the PROD template until these have been suppled. The band's website and Facebook page do not count. Thank you. Harry the Dog WOOF 11:03, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can I suggest you move this to your sandbox and work on it there. Right now it smacks of a fanboi promo stuff with promotional "refs". This band is probably not notable at the moment. You should probably wait until it has had more (some) coverage in reliable sources. Harry the Dog WOOF 11:31, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Harry the Dirty Dog. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please read up on what is and is not a reliable source. Nothing you have added so far is reliable or supports notability. As I have said before, you would be better off moving this to your sandbox to work on at leisure and then bring it back to mainspace when it is ready. But frankly it seems this band is too new to be covered in reliable sources. Notability is not inherited, so the band itself is not notable just because one of its members is. Harry the Dog WOOF 12:22, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Markrune. You have new messages at Harry the Dirty Dog's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ok will see what the other prod says, at least the current page is up to date as far as I am concerned now and has the links from Music week and Louder Than War, which I think are the most robust references. As I said I am only trying to provide an onward link to Rachel Stamp page. I did not think it appropriate to just add this info to that page as it is a separate musical projet and from my experience with bands - the other members of the former band can get a bit upset about this. Markrune (talk) 17:06, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article She Made Me Do It has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Still not adequately sourced. Blogs, promotional sites etc. don't count. Neither do the band's own website. Reliable sources with fact checking are required.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Harry the Dog WOOF 16:18, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The references you have supplied are still not good enough IMO. Another editor will review the prod and will come to a view one way or another. Harry the Dog WOOF 16:20, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited She Made Me Do It, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cabaret Voltaire. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article She Made Me Do It is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/She Made Me Do It until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Harry the Dog WOOF 10:05, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Markrune. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]