User talk:Markl222

I know that the Ken Jennings rumor is true because I was a contestant on Jeopardy the week after he lost, therefore i can confirm that he had recently lost, and guess at the approximate number of games he played. I have an idea of his minimum winnings because Johnny Gilbert was doing a series of voice recordings before the games for that day. He kept repeating "Whose cash winnings total $2,105,200" (obviously this number is random and inaccurate, just used here as an example). He must have recorded more than a dozen of those, the numbers getting higher each time until he reached $2.6 and change. I can't say for sure he didn't record a series of much higher totals later on, so the amount could be substantially higher, but I tend to doubt it. He also never mentioned Ken by name, but it was clear who he was talking about. What the recordings were for I can't say. It sort of sounded like he was doing the intro at the beginning of the show, but those are recorded at the taping of each episode, and give the name and number of shows won, neither of which he mentioned, so I'd have to speculate.

I know the person who beat him didn't go on a huge streak because that person did not appear the day I did, and therefore could not have won more than a handful of games, and maybe even just that one. That she was a woman was what another player said, but I can't confirm that either. I also heard a rumor of what the question he lost on was, but again, its like 4th hand information, and may easily be unreliable. Hope that clears some stuff up for you. -R. fiend 04:42, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I guess I could be remembering wrong; maybe it was closer to 2.5 million, but it do think I recall Johnny Gilbert saying 2.6+. I can't say I was writing any of it down. I guess we'll see in a few weeks. -R. fiend 22:22, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)

>_>

<_<

^_^

I've done a image based on yours,

File:Ministryofmagic.png

,but I'm not sure what is your image's copyright status. --Kakurady 14:58, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ministryofmagic.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 15:01, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Doom maledict.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:13, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Monster VG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:31, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]