User talk:Macdonjo

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  SmartSE (talk) 18:54, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is obvious from your contributions and your youtube uploads that you are only here to promote yourself and other entities as SEO. SmartSE (talk) 18:56, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Macdonjo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I added a YouTube link as a reference because it was fit. If you would like me to remove my references to my videos, that's fine. I am very well respected on the topic of SEO (well recognized since 2009) and contribute on a number of SEO articles here. I am also studying computer science, so sometimes contribute in related sections, including startups. I didn't mean for my YouTube reference(s) to come across as spam. If you have any other concerns, let me know, I'd be happy to comply. Macdonjo (talk) 19:36, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Before we can even consider this request, we need a complete list of paying clients that you have edited Wikipedia on behalf of per our Terms of Use. MER-C 08:01, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

I was referring to your previous creations of Josh MacDonald Inc and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Josh MacDonald followed by links to joshmacdonald.net where you have a guide on how to insert spam references. You've recently created four articles that are almost certainly SEO. SmartSE (talk) 20:19, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Smale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Smale until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 20:26, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MacDonald Turkey Point Marina is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MacDonald Turkey Point Marina until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 14:00, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on 360 Cashmere, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ☆ Bri (talk) 20:15, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]