User talk:MPRabbity

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qcne were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the first half is unsourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Merope Mills and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 14:06, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MPRabbity! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 14:06, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Subject fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG. What the subject wrote does not make her notable. It's possible Martha's Rule is notable, so you should write about that. But, since you're an SPA we know you won't do that.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Merope Mills and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 16:46, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your comments. I don't understand what you mean when you say 'we know you won't do that'. Martha's Rule is attracting global interest and is being discussed in government and needs a Wiki article. It is closely associated with the subject of my draft article, because her interventions are at the heart of the initiative. Which is why I chose to write it that way. But I would happily reframe it as an article on Martha's Rule, if that's what you advise. MPRabbity (talk) 16:59, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Xkalponik was:

The draft appears to be well-written and structured for the most part. However, there are a few points where potential bias or subjective language could be addressed to enhance neutrality. The draft repeatedly highlights support for Martha's Rule from various sources. Please provide a more balanced presentation of viewpoints regarding Martha's Rule, including potential criticisms or differing perspectives. [small notes: 1. provide a citation for the last sentence of the draft, 2. bold the "Martha's Rule" in the opening sentence].

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Martha's Rule and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

X (talk) 11:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MPRabbity. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Martha's Rule, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation concerning any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Please acknowledge if you are Merope Mills, or in a way related to/hired by them. It is imperative you do so. If you're not promised compensation or already have received any, please disclose it (see WP:COIPAYDISCLOSE), and even if there's no compensation involved, but you're the subject or in contact with them, you must disclose it using this method WP:DISCLOSE. Complying with our policies will save you from hassles/troubles. Regards. X (talk) 21:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Martha's Rule, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mgp28 (talk) 22:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MPRabbity. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Merope Mills, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MPRabbity. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Merope Mills".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:01, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]