User talk:MBMBMBM

Hello, I'm Visioncurve. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bikramjeet Singh have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Visioncurve^{Timendi causa est nescire} 07:19, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bikramjeet Singh, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Visioncurve^{Timendi causa est nescire} 07:19, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Bikramjeet Singh, you may be blocked from editing. Greyjoy ^talk 07:20, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Bikramjeet Singh. Visioncurve^{Timendi causa est nescire} 07:20, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:uw-disruptive4im|Bikramjeet Singh| }} Visioncurve^{Timendi causa est nescire} 07:22, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Bikramjeet Singh, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Visioncurve^{Timendi causa est nescire} 07:23, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 07:27, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]