User talk:LukeDXer

Hi LukeDXer! I noticed your contributions to StoryFire and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! ChromaNebula (talk) 02:58, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Whilst your effort to contributing is greatly appreciated, "StoryFire's official twitter page" is not an independent, reliable source. As such, you did not cite the necessary sources for your statements. This Violates WP:NOR. Additionally, your edits went onto demonstrate bias towards the subject with MOS:PUFFERY violations. (Including but not limited to "On September 27, 2017 StoryFire released an revolutionary update where users could interact with a story and later videos by commenting and liking a publication. "

If you plan to re-write your contributions to this article, these issues must be corrected.

(I additionally recommend you read - WP:NEUTRAL and WP:RELIABILITY )

Thank you, Best of luck. ✯✬✩⛥InterestGather (talk) 20:31, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the quick response and words of encouragement. So, for future reference, how would I properly cite evidence? Do you I write in the paragraph, we’re I found this information? LukeDXer (talk) 22:41, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You use WP Citations, to get a better understanding take a quick look at WP:REFBEGIN. It will give you a good guide of what you need to know to fix this. Thank you for seeking improvement, I wish you luck on your article addition. ✯✬✩⛥InterestGather (talk) 23:23, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article StoryFire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StoryFire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

throast (talk) 16:29, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited KVMO, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KRTK. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]