User talk:Lji1942
Welcome
Welcome!
Hello, Lji1942, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
InsufficientData (talk) 15:10, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
Please don't point redlinks in articles to unrelated entries to remove them. Redlinks aren't bad and actually help Wikipedia grow, if there's a chance the redlinked article could actually be written. Or be bold and take a shot at writing one of the articles that are redlinked. See WP:RED for more information on the role of redlinks in Wikipedia. --InsufficientData (talk) 15:15, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
June 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Colposcopy, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — sligocki (talk) 23:50, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Please
Excuse me. Comment absolutly accepted.Lji1942 14:10, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:58, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/39/Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg.png)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:44, 12 June 2011 (UTC)Pneumonia
Could you clarify this edit please? Some random words were removed, seemingly without good reason. JFW | T@lk 10:59, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
No, I cannot clarify it. It was not my activity and I cannot agree neighter with the modifications.Lji1942 13:02, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Pneumonia worked, and it has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Inks.LWC (talk) 10:59, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
I cannot understand the Pneumonia history at all. It is not my "contribution". The only contribution Nerve plexus is my work. It must be a mistake. Or...I dont know. Lji1942 13:59, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Maybe it wuld be better to delete my user page. Something is wrong with it.Lji1942 14:27, 27 June 2011 (UTC) (I cannot controll who other(s) acessed and use it in my name.)
Is it possible change to a secure and secrete code?Lji1942 17:53, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
I changed my code. Modification of Pneumonia is not my "work". My latest activity was a small modificiation in Nerve plexus. No other theme was modified. (Excuse me for my poor English.) I am able to read and translate English medical texts to Hungarian, but my spoken or written English is very poor. Yours sincerelly:Lji1942 12:44, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Ovarian Cancer
Thank you for your contribution the the above article. Sincerely — DocOfSoc • Talk • 06:18, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Stroke
I don't regard these edits as constructive.[1] I note that inexplicable edits have occurred from your account before. If you account is compromised, it is likely to get blocked to prevent further abuse. Please confirm that you're in control of the account and that you will be making constructive edits. If you believe the edits were made by someone else, please change your password. Any further vandalism/strange edits will lead to blocking of this account. JFW | T@lk 13:20, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Password
Has been changed.Lji1942 19:24, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
- Very well. With regards to your addition to stroke, please have a look at the external links guidance, including the kind of links we wish to avoid. I don't think the MedicineNet link to the slideshow should definitely be added. JFW | T@lk 23:20, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
- The sources you added are not of the kind that I would expect in a high-profile article such as stroke. Have a look at WP:MEDRS, please. JFW | T@lk 07:18, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
- OK.Lji1942 07:43, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
References
Many thanks for adding references to the stoke article. Wondering if you could use review articles / major textbooks per WP:MEDRS? Thanks Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:11, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
- I think I coud. Thanks:Lji1942 05:26, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- If you need help with access let me know. Cheers Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:28, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Than You
Csigabi.Lji1942 08:42, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)