User talk:Libra Justin

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Libra Justin! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! clpo13_(talk) 16:57, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Frederick Charles, Duke of Württemberg-Winnental, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 09:20, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to William Frederick, Margrave of Brandenburg-Ansbach, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 09:31, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barbara of Württemberg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara of Württemberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jimandjam (talk) 10:19, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Marie of Mecklenburg-Güstrow, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:44, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do not move this or any other draft without adequate sourcing again - Wikia and other "pedias" cannot ever be used. PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:45, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is it that the page is considered a "draft" for lacking sources? Which you just deleted? Libra Justin (talk) 15:01, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's in draft space for you to work on and add sources per WP:V and to establish notability based on sources. AKA not fandom and geneology sites. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:03, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Asilvering were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marie of Mecklenburg-Güstrow and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Marie of Mecklenburg-Güstrow, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 00:30, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Libra Justin! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! asilvering (talk) 00:30, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Heinrich LI, Prince Reuss of Ebersdorf, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 14:59, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Heinrich LI, Prince Reuss of Ebersdorf, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:26, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Two sources is at best borderline in terms of establishing notability. And as neither is actually cited, it isn't clear which source supports what information. Please see WP:REFB for advice on referencing, and WP:GNG on notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Heinrich LI, Prince Reuss of Ebersdorf and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:30, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Libra Justin. Thank you for your intervention on the article Thomas Butler, 6th Earl of Ossory. You claim you "fixed the image". What you did is you deleted the crop that made the image on the infobox zoom in to show the face in ID-photo fashion. The entire uncropped appears further down in the text. Now we have the entire portrait twice: once in the infobox and once in the text. How is this an improvement? What mistake did you fix? Did you somewhere find a Wikipedia policy or guideline that prescribes this "fix"? Best regards, Johannes Schade (talk) 07:28, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We do not need his face shown in what you called, "ID-photo" fashion. What makes you think the image of the individual should show nothing more than his face? What mistake do you think I DIDN'T fix? Which Wikipedia policy or guideline did you find that explains why the image should be altered this way? Best regards, Libra Justin Libra Justin (talk) 07:54, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Libra Justice. Indeed, as you pointed out: nothing in Wikipedia demands that the face of a biographical subject should be shown in ID-photo fashion. I am not an very experienced editor and should perhaps have formulated my remark more politely. Please accept my apologies. I just naïvely thought that giving a zoom-in to better show his face in addition to showing the entire portrait further down would illustrate the subject better. Is not his face a bit small when the entire portrait is shown in the infobox? Are not people often identified by their faces? I have have given that treatment to several portraits of historical biographies. I now looked up in MOS:IMAGE and found that cropping for such a purpose seems to be explicitly allowed. The MOS says (MOS:IMAGE#Editing images) "An image's utility or quality may be improved by cropping (to focus on the relevant portion)". Of course "Images should not be changed in ways that materially mislead the viewer." (MOS:IMAGE#Editing images). I think I should have added a caption that says the image is cropped. Should you not have deleted the image in the text to avoid dup;lication after removing the crop? With best regards, Johannes Schade (talk) 21:04, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I accept your apology. I have looked up MOS:IMAGE and found that such adjustment you made is in fact allowed. In my opinion, the original, uncropped image is already suitable, but I acknowledge the purpose of you cropping the image as ID-photo fashion and yes, adding a captain explaining it would definitely help. Best regards, Libra Justin (talk) 03:34, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Crato, Prince of Hohenlohe-Langenburg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kraft, Prince of Hohenlohe-Langenburg. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:30, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Libra Justin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Marie of Mecklenburg-Güstrow, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Libra Justin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John Bogislaw, Duke of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Norburg, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Libra Justin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Heinrich LI, Prince Reuss of Ebersdorf, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Libra Justin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Marie of Mecklenburg-Güstrow".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:30, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Libra Justin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Heinrich LI".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:47, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Libra Justin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John Bogislaw".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:54, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]