User talk:Leoniceno

Welcome! Hello Leoniceno! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, ask me on my talk page, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. And remember, no question is "stupid"; if you have anything, absolutely anything that you'd like to know, feel free to drop on by and leave me a message! :) Happy editing! Basketball110 My story/Tell me yours Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting adopted Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting Help My Talk Page New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Hi. I just deleted a couple of pages that you very correctly reported as attack pages. It's just a note, but with clear cut attack pages you can also blank them at the same time, replcing the text with a db-attack template and adding "Page blanked per WP:BLP" or similar. It's not essential, but it stops the attack being overtly visible. Anyhow, it's just a hint. Thanks very much for your hard work keeping Wikipedia clean of this kind of thing - and if you ever need any help please feel free to ask! Cheers! Pedro :  Chat  09:30, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would be more than happy to adopt you. I will answer any questions you need answers to, and prepare lessons per your request. Just accept or decline on my talk page...... Dendodge .. Talk^Help 11:51, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to Salinas to return to tna. Thank you. Otisjimmy1 (talk) 03:37, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re Charles and James Steuart, articles marked for speedy deletion: I think you are being a bit hasty - both Charles and James Steuart are of note in that, as members of a planter family in Maryland before and during the Revolutionary war, their loyalties were divided beteen The Crown and to the fledgling United States. The American Revolution may in part be seen as a kind of Civil War, in many ways a fratricidal one in which families were divided. Charles Steuart shows this very well; he himself was a Tory and yet joined the flying camp militia, and was on social terms with George Washington. So he helps to illustrate the very grey nature of loyalties during the Revolutionary War and is therefore part of an important historical context. As for the book it is taken from, Nelker includes a great deal of historically noteworthy primary source material. I hope to be able to find secondary sources in due course. - Alex Williams —Preceding unsigned comment added by Asteuartw (talk • contribs) 07:46, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Leoniceno, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to List of famous Television and movie coperations. Includes each indivual franchise. has been removed. It was removed by Darkdylaner with the following edit summary '(no edit summary)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Darkdylaner before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 20:56, 8 September 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)[reply]

Hello Leoniceno, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I contested the speedy deletion of Surveyor-Hunveyor Mathematica demonstrations - a page you tagged - because: A1 applies only to _very_ short articles and context is clear enough. PROD or AfD instead. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. Tim Song (talk) 19:01, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you a hundred percent! Please see the section I added on the “Viscount Severn” Talk Page right under yours on notability. You are a Newpage Patroller whereas I just edit every now and then. I have no idea how one gets an article deleted, but in this case I would like to start the effort and would appreciate your assistance as you apparently agree with me. This page is an insult to all serious Wikipedians!HistoryBuff14 (talk) 16:29, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Leoniceno, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Rijnlands Lyceum Sassenheim, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: looks like a school to me. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 15:06, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Leoniceno, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Nalaya Brown, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 15:11, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Leoniceno. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, The Times-Sentinel, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 20:45, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Times-Sentinel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Times-Sentinel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ubiquity (talk) 01:57, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Leoniceno,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Leoniceno. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Leoniceno. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Legend of zelda axis of shadows. Since you had some involvement with the Legend of zelda axis of shadows redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:35, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Leoniceno. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]