User talk:Ldmarion

Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created Government House (St. Augustine), and I noticed that your username, "Govhouselibrary", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username, by completing this form, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 20:12, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ldmarion

I see that you have been adding {{Infobox NRHP}} to many articles, e.g. to Gómez House (St. Augustine). (The version as you edited it is https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=G%C3%B3mez_House_(St._Augustine)&oldid=872186848)

However, the way in which you have done has caused the pages to be incorrectly categorised in Category:Historic district contributing properties in USA Florida. That is a category which does not exist, and should not be created because it does not conform to Wikipedia's naming conventions for categories.

This happens because the infobox uses some complex parameters which are easily misconfigured. For help on how to avoid these issue, please ask at Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places.

In the meantime, I have tweaked the infoboxes which you added to over 15 articles, to stop them from populating any categories, by adding the parameter |nocat=yes (e.g. here[1]). This is not an ideal solution, so it would be a good idea to ask for help on how to use the infobox properly.

Best wishes, --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 05:09, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Albert Manucy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carnegie Foundation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ldmarion,

Thanks for creating Historic St. Augustine Preservation Board! I edit here too, under the username Rosguill and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Consider rewriting some of the headers so that it's easier for someone unfamiliar with the subject to find relevant information.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:10, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating William L. Sims II.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for starting the new article on William L. Sims II.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:46, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]