User talk:Lankenstein

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Output (Wolfgang Dauner album). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:43, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NALBUM - ECM Records is a primary source and Discogs is not an acceptable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Output (Wolfgang Dauner album) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Output (Wolfgang Dauner album), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 23:45, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lankenstein! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 23:45, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I also started out editing music articles on Wikipedia, so I realise how daunting it can be sometimes when your learning the ropes. What I did come to understand is not every musical group, album or song is considered notable. Just because an album exists it doesn't automatically make it notable. It is particularly hard to meet the notability standards for older music recordings and non-mainstream music genres - as there just aren't many online sources. Sites such as Discogs, MusicBrainz and RateYourMusic are not considered acceptable sources as they are largely user generated without any independent editorial oversight. Likewise music retail sites are not acceptable sources either. The Allmusic site establishes that the album exists but not that it is notable. The best way of establishing notability, per WP:NALBUM, is to demonstrate that there is significant coverage (about the album & not just mentions in passing) in multiple independent reliable secondary sources - which is why independent reviews on sites such as Allmusic are good. Hope that helps - happy editing - if you have anymore questions drop me a line. Dan arndt (talk) 01:31, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rouge (Louis Sclavis Quintet album), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Bilorv (talk) 00:30, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lankenstein. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Output (Wolfgang Dauner album), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lankenstein. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Output".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:34, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]