User talk:Lachsonchan

Please don't add your own name to lists of alumni. If everyone did this, the articles would be unreadable. Per WP:LISTBIO, we need citations to reliable sources to verify someone is an alumni, and they must satisfy our notability criteria. Wikipedia is not a social networking website where you can promote yourself; it is an encyclopedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:01, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself, at Draft:Lachson Chan. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 12:36, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lachson Chan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lachson Chan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 12:37, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would add that social media accounts are not acceptable as sources; only independent reliable sources are permitted; they must be independent of the subject(you) and offer in depth coverage of you. In order to successfully write an autobiographical article, you must set aside everything you know about yourself and write based only on what independent sources state. 331dot (talk) 12:42, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Lachsonchan, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 12:37, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mean as custard. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mean as custard (talk) 11:06, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as the one you made with this edit to Propaganda in North Korea, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:32, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Lachson Chan, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Lachson Chan and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Lachson Chan during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:30, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]